• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于群组的肝癌手术后疼痛和结局轨迹分析。

Group-based trajectory analysis of postoperative pain and outcomes after liver cancer surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;84(1):95-100. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000446.

DOI:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000446
PMID:33177401
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies have shown connections between pain and worse cancer outcomes, few clinical studies have evaluated their direct association, and the current study aimed to investigate the potential association between acute pain trajectories and postoperative outcomes after liver cancer surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a single medical center and included patients who received liver cancer surgery between January 2010 and December 2016. Maximal pain intensity was recorded daily using a numerical rating scale during the first postoperative week. Group-based trajectory analysis was performed to classify the variations in pain scores over time. Cox and linear regression analyses were used to assess the effect of pain trajectories on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and length of hospital stay (LOS) after surgery and to explore predictors of these outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 804 patients with 5396 pain score observations were analyzed within the present study. Group-based trajectory analysis categorized the changes in postoperative pain into three groups: group 1 had constantly mild pain (76.6%), group 2 had moderate/severe pain dropping to mild (10.1%), and group 3 had mild pain rebounding to moderate (13.3%). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that on average, group 3 had a 7% increase in LOS compared with the group 1 (p = 0.02) and no significant difference in the LOS was noted between pain trajectory groups 2 and 1 (p = 0.93). Pain trajectories were not associated with recurrence-free survival or overall survival after liver cancer surgery.

CONCLUSION

Acute pain trajectories were associated with LOS but not cancer recurrence and survival after liver cancer surgery. Group-based trajectory analysis provided a promising approach for investigating the complex relationships between variations in postoperative pain over time and clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

尽管先前的研究表明疼痛与癌症预后恶化之间存在关联,但很少有临床研究评估它们之间的直接关联,本研究旨在探讨肝癌手术后急性疼痛轨迹与术后结局之间的潜在关联。

方法

本回顾性研究在一家医疗中心进行,纳入 2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间接受肝癌手术的患者。术后第一周每天使用数字评分量表记录最大疼痛强度。采用基于群组的轨迹分析方法对疼痛评分随时间的变化进行分类。Cox 和线性回归分析用于评估疼痛轨迹对肝癌手术后无复发生存、总生存和住院时间(LOS)的影响,并探讨这些结局的预测因素。

结果

本研究共分析了 804 例患者的 5396 次疼痛评分观察值。基于群组的轨迹分析将术后疼痛变化分为三组:第 1 组为持续轻度疼痛(76.6%),第 2 组为中重度/严重疼痛降至轻度(10.1%),第 3 组为轻度疼痛反弹至中重度(13.3%)。多变量分析表明,平均而言,第 3 组的 LOS 比第 1 组增加了 7%(p = 0.02),而第 2 组和第 1 组之间的 LOS 无显著差异(p = 0.93)。疼痛轨迹与肝癌手术后无复发生存或总生存无关。

结论

急性疼痛轨迹与肝癌手术后的 LOS 相关,但与癌症复发和生存无关。基于群组的轨迹分析为研究术后疼痛随时间变化与临床结局之间的复杂关系提供了一种有前途的方法。

相似文献

1
Group-based trajectory analysis of postoperative pain and outcomes after liver cancer surgery.基于群组的肝癌手术后疼痛和结局轨迹分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;84(1):95-100. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000446.
2
An investigation of the relationships between postoperative pain trajectories and outcomes after surgery for colorectal cancer.探讨结直肠癌手术后术后疼痛轨迹与结局之间的关系。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Nov;82(11):865-871. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000166.
3
Group-based trajectory analysis of postoperative pain in epidural analgesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and risk factors of rebound pain.基于群组的胸腔镜手术后硬膜外镇痛术后疼痛轨迹分析和反弹痛的风险因素。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2022 Feb 1;85(2):216-221. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000647.
4
Group-based trajectory analysis of acute pain after spine surgery and risk factors for rebound pain.脊柱手术后急性疼痛的基于群组的轨迹分析及疼痛反弹的危险因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 22;9:907126. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.907126. eCollection 2022.
5
Dynamic analysis of variations in postoperative pain trajectories over time in patients receiving epidural analgesia using latent curve models.采用潜在曲线模型分析接受硬膜外镇痛的患者术后疼痛轨迹随时间变化的动态分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;83(1):89-94. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000200.
6
Prospective, single-center cohort study analyzing the efficacy of complete laparoscopic resection on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.一项前瞻性单中心队列研究,分析完全腹腔镜切除术对复发性肝细胞癌的疗效。
Chin J Cancer. 2016 Mar 8;35:25. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0088-0.
7
Postoperative local incision analgesia for acute pain treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者术后局部切口镇痛用于急性疼痛治疗
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2018 Feb;64(2):175-180. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.02.175.
8
In-hospital opioid consumption, but not pain intensity scores, predicts 6-month levels of pain catastrophizing following hepatic resection: A trajectory analysis.住院期间阿片类药物的使用量而非疼痛强度评分可预测肝切除术后 6 个月的疼痛灾难化水平:轨迹分析。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):503-514. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1324. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
Predicting Acute Postoperative Pain Trajectories and Long-Term Outcomes of Adolescents after Spinal Fusion Surgery.预测青少年脊柱融合术后急性疼痛轨迹及长期预后
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Feb 24;2020:9874739. doi: 10.1155/2020/9874739. eCollection 2020.
10
[Surgical treatment of primary liver cancer:a report of 10 966 cases].[原发性肝癌的外科治疗:10966例报告]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 1;59(1):6-17. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20201110-00791.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of Pain Management Strategies After Hepatectomy: Evidence Summary and Delphi Study.肝切除术后疼痛管理策略的构建:证据总结与德尔菲研究
J Pain Res. 2024 Dec 27;17:4541-4559. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S494243. eCollection 2024.
2
Group-based trajectory analysis of acute pain after spine surgery and risk factors for rebound pain.脊柱手术后急性疼痛的基于群组的轨迹分析及疼痛反弹的危险因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 22;9:907126. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.907126. eCollection 2022.