The George Institute for Global Health, 311-312, Third Floor, Elegance Tower, Plot No. 8, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi 110025, India.
Baltimore, United States of America.
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):747-753. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.249565. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
To develop a primary health-care monitoring framework and health outcome indicator list, and field-test and triangulate indicators designed to assess health reforms in Kerala, India, 2018-2019.
We used a modified Delphi technique to develop a 23-item indicator list to monitor primary health care. We used a multistage cluster random sampling technique to select one district from each of four district clusters, and then select both a family and a primary health centre from each of the four districts. We field-tested and triangulated the indicators using facility data and a population-based household survey.
Our data revealed similarities between facility and survey data for some indicators (e.g. low birth weight and pre-check services), but differences for others (e.g. acute diarrhoeal diseases in children younger than 5 years and blood pressure screening). We made four critical observations: (i) data are available at the facility level but in varying formats; (ii) established global indicators may not always be useful in local monitoring; (iii) operational definitions must be refined; and (iv) triangulation and feedback from the field is vital.
We observe that, while data can be used to develop indices of progress, interpretation of these indicators requires great care. In the attainment of universal health coverage, we consider that our observations of the utility of certain health indicators will provide valuable insights for practitioners and supervisors in the development of a primary health-care monitoring mechanism.
制定初级卫生保健监测框架和卫生结果指标清单,并对旨在评估印度喀拉拉邦 2018-2019 年卫生改革的指标进行现场测试和三角检验。
我们使用改良德尔菲技术制定了一个包含 23 项指标的清单,用于监测初级卫生保健。我们使用多阶段聚类随机抽样技术从四个地区组中各选择一个区,然后从四个区中的每一个区选择一个家庭和一个初级卫生中心。我们使用设施数据和基于人群的家庭调查对指标进行现场测试和三角检验。
我们的数据显示,一些指标(如低出生体重和预检查服务)的设施数据和调查数据之间存在相似性,但其他指标(如 5 岁以下儿童急性腹泻病和血压筛查)之间存在差异。我们得出了四个关键观察结果:(i)数据可在设施层面获得,但格式不同;(ii)既定的全球指标在本地监测中可能并不总是有用;(iii)操作定义必须细化;(iv)来自现场的三角检验和反馈至关重要。
我们观察到,虽然数据可用于制定进展指数,但这些指标的解释需要非常谨慎。在实现全民健康覆盖的过程中,我们认为,我们对某些卫生指标的实用性的观察将为初级卫生保健监测机制的制定者和监督者提供宝贵的见解。