Zeemering Stef, van Hunnik Arne, van Rosmalen Frank, Bonizzi Pietro, Scaf Billy, Delhaas Tammo, Verheule Sander, Schotten Ulrich
Department of Physiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Front Physiol. 2020 Oct 15;11:570118. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.570118. eCollection 2020.
Electrical contact mapping provides a detailed view of conduction patterns in the atria during atrial fibrillation (AF). Identification of repetitive wave front propagation mechanisms potentially initiating or sustaining AF might provide more insights into temporal and spatial distribution of candidate AF mechanism and identify targets for catheter ablation. We developed a novel tool based on recurrence plots to automatically identify and characterize repetitive conduction patterns in high-density contact mapping of AF.
Recurrence plots were constructed by first transforming atrial electrograms recorded by a multi-electrode array to activation-phase signals and then quantifying the degree of similarity between snapshots of the activation-phase in the electrode array. An AF cycle length dependent distance threshold was applied to discriminate between repetitive and non-repetitive snapshots. Intervals containing repetitive conduction patterns were detected in a recurrence plot as regions with a high recurrence rate. Intervals that contained similar repetitive patterns were then grouped into clusters. To demonstrate the ability to detect and quantify the incidence, duration and size of repetitive patterns, the tool was applied to left and right atrial recordings in a goat model of different duration of persistent AF [3 weeks AF (3 wkAF, = 8) and 22 weeks AF (22 wkAF, = 8)], using a 249-electrode mapping array (2.4 mm inter-electrode distance).
Recurrence plots identified frequent recurrences of activation patterns in all recordings and indicated a strong correlation between recurrence plot threshold and AF cycle length. Prolonged AF duration was associated with shorter repetitive pattern duration [mean maximum duration 3 wkAF: 74 cycles, 95% confidence interval (54-94) vs. 22 wkAF: 41 cycles (21-62), = 0.03], and smaller recurrent regions within repetitive patterns [3 wkAF 1.7 cm (1.0-2.3) vs. 22 wkAF 0.5 cm (0.0-1.2), = 0.02]. Both breakthrough patterns and re-entry were identified as repetitive conduction patterns.
Recurrence plots provide a novel way to delineate high-density contact mapping of AF. Dominant repetitive conduction patterns were identified in a goat model of sustained AF. Application of the developed methodology using the new generation of multi-electrode catheters could identify additional targets for catheter ablation of AF.
电接触标测可详细显示心房颤动(AF)期间心房的传导模式。识别可能启动或维持AF的重复波前传播机制,可能会为AF机制的时间和空间分布提供更多见解,并确定导管消融的靶点。我们基于递归图开发了一种新型工具,用于自动识别和表征AF高密度接触标测中的重复传导模式。
通过首先将多电极阵列记录的心房电图转换为激活相信号,然后量化电极阵列中激活相快照之间的相似程度,构建递归图。应用与AF周期长度相关的距离阈值来区分重复和非重复快照。在递归图中,将包含重复传导模式的区间检测为具有高复发率的区域。然后将包含相似重复模式的区间分组为簇。为了证明检测和量化重复模式的发生率、持续时间和大小的能力,使用249电极标测阵列(电极间距2.4mm),将该工具应用于不同持续时间的持续性AF山羊模型的左心房和右心房记录[3周AF(3wkAF,n = 8)和22周AF(22wkAF,n = 8)]。
递归图在所有记录中均识别出激活模式的频繁复发,并表明递归图阈值与AF周期长度之间存在强相关性。AF持续时间延长与重复模式持续时间缩短相关[平均最大持续时间3wkAF:74个周期,95%置信区间(54 - 94)对22wkAF:41个周期(21 - 62),P = 0.03],且重复模式内的复发区域较小[3wkAF 1.7cm(1.0 - 2.3)对22wkAF 0.5cm(0.0 - 1.2),P = 0.02]。突破模式和折返均被识别为重复传导模式。
递归图为描绘AF的高密度接触标测提供了一种新方法。在持续性AF山羊模型中识别出了主要的重复传导模式。使用新一代多电极导管应用所开发的方法,可能会识别出AF导管消融的额外靶点。