Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University, Medical Center & Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Europace. 2021 Mar 4;23(23 Suppl 1):i123-i132. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa403.
Repetitive conduction patterns in atrial fibrillation (AF) may reflect anatomical structures harbouring preferential conduction paths and indicate the presence of stationary sources for AF. Recently, we demonstrated a novel technique to detect repetitive patterns in high-density contact mapping of AF. As a first step towards repetitive pattern mapping to guide AF ablation, we determined the incidence, prevalence, and trajectories of repetitive conduction patterns in epicardial contact mapping of paroxysmal and persistent AF patients.
A 256-channel mapping array was used to record epicardial left and right AF electrograms in persistent AF (persAF, n = 9) and paroxysmal AF (pAF, n = 11) patients. Intervals containing repetitive conduction patterns were detected using recurrence plots. Activation movies, preferential conduction direction, and average activation sequence were used to characterize and classify conduction patterns. Repetitive patterns were identified in 33/40 recordings. Repetitive patterns were more prevalent in pAF compared with persAF [pAF: median 59%, inter-quartile range (41-72) vs. persAF: 39% (0-51), P < 0.01], larger [pAF: = 1.54 (1.15-1.96) vs. persAF: 1.16 (0.74-1.56) cm2, P < 0.001), and more stable [normalized preferentiality (0-1) pAF: 0.38 (0.25-0.50) vs. persAF: 0.23 (0-0.33), P < 0.01]. Most repetitive patterns were peripheral waves (87%), often with conduction block (69%), while breakthroughs (9%) and re-entries (2%) occurred less frequently.
High-density epicardial contact mapping in AF patients reveals frequent repetitive conduction patterns. In persistent AF patients, repetitive patterns were less frequent, smaller, and more variable than in paroxysmal AF patients. Future research should elucidate whether these patterns can help in finding AF ablation targets.
心房颤动(AF)中的重复传导模式可能反映了具有优先传导路径的解剖结构,并表明 AF 存在静止源。最近,我们展示了一种在 AF 高密度接触映射中检测重复模式的新技术。作为将重复模式映射引导 AF 消融的第一步,我们确定了阵发性和持续性 AF 患者心外膜接触映射中重复传导模式的发生率、患病率和轨迹。
使用 256 通道映射阵列记录持续性 AF(persAF,n=9)和阵发性 AF(pAF,n=11)患者的心外膜左、右 AF 电图。使用递归图检测包含重复传导模式的间隔。使用激活电影、优先传导方向和平均激活序列来描述和分类传导模式。在 33/40 次记录中识别出重复模式。与 persAF 相比,pAF 中重复模式更为常见[pAF:中位数 59%(41-72)vs. persAF:39%(0-51),P<0.01],更大[pAF:=1.54(1.15-1.96)vs. persAF:1.16(0.74-1.56)cm2,P<0.001],更稳定[归一化优先性(0-1)pAF:0.38(0.25-0.50)vs. persAF:0.23(0-0.33),P<0.01]。大多数重复模式是周围波(87%),常伴有传导阻滞(69%),而突破(9%)和再入(2%)则较少发生。
在 AF 患者的高密度心外膜接触映射中发现了频繁的重复传导模式。在持续性 AF 患者中,重复模式的频率、大小和变异性均低于阵发性 AF 患者。未来的研究应阐明这些模式是否有助于寻找 AF 消融靶点。