Fine E J
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.
Semin Nucl Med. 1987 Oct;17(4):350-9. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(87)80026-0.
The management of autonomous (primary or tertiary) hyperparathyroidism is controversial for two important reasons: (1) Diagnosis of primary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism (as distinct from reactive or secondary hyperparathyroidism) has been revolutionized in the past 20 years as a result of routine inclusion of serum calcium concentration assays in serum multiautomated analysis, now obtained routinely for both hospitalized as well as ambulatory patients. The prevalence of primary hyperparathyroidism in the general population has appeared to rise as a consequence of this assay and the enhanced detection of this disease. This situation has confused the management of hyperparathyroidism since most patients now present with asymptomatic disease, and the need for surgical treatment is controversial in asymptomatic individuals. (2) Primary hyperparathyroidism usually is caused by hypersecretion of parathyroid hormone by an autonomously functioning parathyroid adenoma. In a small percentage of cases, multigland hyperplasia is present. In experienced hands, surgical removal of an adenoma within the thyroid bed cures the hyperparathyroidism 90% to 95% of the time, without performance of a preoperative procedure to localize the adenoma. Approximately 10% of parathyroid tissue is ectopic in location, however. Furthermore, approximately two thirds of "missed" adenomas are within the thyroid bed. Reexploration in the event of a failed operation therefore is not an uncommon occurrence. Parathyroid localization procedures clearly are indicated in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who have evidence of persistent disease after a failed attempt at surgical cure. In patients first presenting with primary hyperparathyroidism, the need for a localization procedure is less clear, since surgery appears to be successful much of the time without it. Regardless of the nature of the above controversies, surgery for autonomous hyperparathyroidism continues, and localization procedures become more popular. Preoperative localization procedures such as angiography and venography with venous sampling for parathormone are cumbersome and invasive. Noninvasive tests to localize the parathyroid glands have emerged in the past 10 years, including dual tracer radionuclide scintigraphy with 201-thallous chloride and 99m-technetium pertechnetate, high-resolution computer tomography, and fine parts ultrasonography. Dual tracer scintigraphy with thallium and technetium is reported to have a localization sensitivity of 70%-90%. False-negative studies occur primarily in patients with small adenomatous or hyperplastic glands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
自主性(原发性或三发性)甲状旁腺功能亢进症的治疗存在争议,主要有两个重要原因:(1)在过去20年里,原发性或三发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症(与反应性或继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症不同)的诊断发生了革命性变化,这是因为血清多项自动分析中常规纳入了血清钙浓度检测,现在无论是住院患者还是门诊患者都常规进行此项检测。由于这项检测以及对该疾病检测能力的增强,普通人群中原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的患病率似乎有所上升。这种情况使甲状旁腺功能亢进症的治疗变得复杂,因为现在大多数患者表现为无症状疾病,而无症状个体是否需要手术治疗存在争议。(2)原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症通常由自主功能亢进的甲状旁腺腺瘤分泌过多甲状旁腺激素引起。在少数情况下,存在多腺体增生。在经验丰富的医生手中,手术切除甲状腺床内的腺瘤,90%至95%的情况下可治愈甲状旁腺功能亢进症,无需术前进行腺瘤定位操作。然而,约10%的甲状旁腺组织位置异常。此外,约三分之二“遗漏”的腺瘤位于甲状腺床内。因此,手术失败后再次探查并不罕见。对于初次手术治疗失败且有持续性疾病证据的原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症患者,甲状旁腺定位操作显然是必要的。对于首次出现原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的患者,是否需要定位操作则不太明确,因为在没有定位操作的情况下,手术大多时候似乎也能成功。无论上述争议的性质如何,自主性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的手术仍在继续,且定位操作越来越受欢迎。术前定位操作,如血管造影和静脉造影及静脉血甲状旁腺激素采样,既繁琐又具有侵入性。在过去10年里,出现了一些用于甲状旁腺定位的非侵入性检查,包括用氯化铊和高锝酸盐进行的双示踪剂放射性核素闪烁扫描、高分辨率计算机断层扫描和精细部位超声检查。据报道,铊和锝双示踪剂闪烁扫描的定位敏感性为70% - 90%。假阴性结果主要出现在腺体较小的腺瘤或增生患者中。