Marmor Simon, Kerroumi Younes, Meyssonnier Vanina, Lhotellier Luc, Mouton Antoine, Graff Wilfrid, Zeller Valérie
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon Hospital, Paris, France.
Referral Center for Osteoarticular Infections, Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon Hospital, Paris, France.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Oct 16;7:540929. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.540929. eCollection 2020.
Prosthetic hip infection (PHI) is a disastrous scenario after an arthroplasty. International guidelines contraindicate one-stage exchange arthroplasty for fistulizing chronic prosthetic hip infection (FCPHI), nevertheless few surgical teams, mostly from Europe, support one stage procedure for this indication. Analysis of infection recurrence and implant failure of a series of FCPHIs treated with one stage arthroplasty. Sixty-six FCPHIs treated with one-stage exchange arthroplasty were prospectively followed up at least 2 years. Clinical, radiological and bacteriological signs suggestive of reinfection were sought, as well as implant failures and PHI related deaths. Thirty-four females and thirty-two males with median age of 69.5 years [61-77] and BMI of 26 kg/m [22-31] were included. Fistulae were productive in 50 patients (76%). was responsible for 45% of PHI and 21% were polymicrobial. Twenty-nine patients (44%) received preoperative antibiotic therapy. After a median 60-month follow-up [35-82], 3 patients (4.5%) presented reinfection (two new infections, one relapse) and 3 patients experienced implant failure (1 femoral fracture, 1 stem breakage, 1 recurrent dislocation). One death was related to PHI. After a minimum of 2 years, the infection control rate was of 95.3% (±0.02). One-stage exchange arthroplasty for FCPHIs showed a good infection control rate similar to that of non-fistulizing PHI. Systematic preoperative microbiological documentation with joint aspiration and, in some specific cases, the use of preoperative antibiotic therapy are among the optimizations accounting for the success of the one-stage arthroplasty. In light of these results, and those of other studies, international recommendations could evolve. Descriptive therapeutic prospective cohort study. Level of evidence: IV.
人工髋关节感染(PHI)是关节置换术后的灾难性情况。国际指南不建议对慢性人工髋关节感染合并瘘管形成(FCPHI)进行一期翻修置换术,然而,少数手术团队(主要来自欧洲)支持针对该适应症的一期手术。对一系列采用一期置换术治疗的FCPHI患者的感染复发和植入物失败情况进行分析。对66例采用一期翻修置换术治疗的FCPHI患者进行了至少2年的前瞻性随访。寻找提示再次感染的临床、放射学和细菌学迹象,以及植入物失败和与PHI相关的死亡情况。纳入了34名女性和32名男性,中位年龄为69.5岁[61 - 77岁],体重指数为26 kg/m²[22 - 31]。50例患者(76%)的瘘管有分泌物。金黄色葡萄球菌导致45%的PHI,21%为多微生物感染。29例患者(44%)接受了术前抗生素治疗。经过中位60个月的随访[35 - 82个月],3例患者(4.5%)出现再次感染(2例新发感染,1例复发),3例患者出现植入物失败(1例股骨骨折,1例柄部断裂,1例复发性脱位)。1例死亡与PHI相关。至少2年后,感染控制率为95.3%(±0.02)。FCPHI的一期翻修置换术显示出与非瘘管形成的PHI相似的良好感染控制率。通过关节穿刺进行系统的术前微生物学记录,以及在某些特定情况下使用术前抗生素治疗,是一期置换术成功的优化措施之一。鉴于这些结果以及其他研究的结果,国际推荐可能会有所改变。描述性治疗前瞻性队列研究。证据级别:IV。