ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases) Research Group, Faculty of Odontology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Periodontology Unit, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3577-3587. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03680-z. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
The aim was to evaluate the rate of bone loss progression during experimentally induced peri-implantitis using two different implant-abutment connections in implants with identical surface topography.
Forty-eight Regular Neck tissue-level SLA implants with a matching implant to abutment connection (TL) and 36 bone-level SLA implants with a switching platform implant to abutment connection (BL) were subjected to experimental peri-implantitis in two independent in vivo pre-clinical investigations. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced by means of silk ligatures during 3 months (induction phase), and followed for one extra month without ligatures (progression phase). Radiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated longitudinally along both studies and subsequently compared between experiments.
During the induction phase, radiographic bone loss was significantly higher in implants with matched abutments compared with those with platform switching connections (2.65 ± 0.66 mm vs 0.84 ± 0.16 mm, respectively, p = 0.001). During the progression phase, both types of implant-abutment connection exhibited similar rates of radiographic bone loss. Similar outcomes were observed clinically.
A platform switching connection resulted in a more benign development of peri-implantitis during the experimental induction phase of the disease. These differences, however, disappeared once the ligatures were removed (progression phase).
Influence of the implant-abutment connection in peri-implantitis progression may be relevant when considering implant selection in the moment of placement. In this sense, platform switching abutment demonstrated less peri-implantitis development when compared to implant matching connection.
本研究旨在评估在相同表面形貌的种植体中,使用两种不同的种植体-基台连接方式,观察实验性种植体周围炎过程中骨吸收的进展速度。
将 48 颗常规颈部 SLA 组织水平种植体(TL 组)和 36 颗骨水平 SLA 种植体(BL 组)随机分为两组,分别采用匹配的种植体-基台连接(TL)和平台转换式种植体-基台连接(BL)。通过丝线结扎的方式诱导 3 个月的实验性种植体周围炎(诱导期),然后不结扎丝线继续观察 1 个月(进展期)。在两个独立的体内临床前研究中对种植体进行纵向影像学和临床评估,并对实验结果进行比较。
在诱导期,匹配基台种植体的放射学骨吸收量明显高于平台转换式基台种植体(分别为 2.65±0.66mm 和 0.84±0.16mm,p=0.001)。在进展期,两种种植体-基台连接方式的放射学骨吸收速率相似。临床结果也相似。
在疾病的实验诱导期,平台转换式连接方式导致种植体周围炎的发展更为良性。然而,一旦去除结扎丝(进展期),这些差异就消失了。
在考虑种植体植入时,种植体-基台连接方式对种植体周围炎进展的影响可能是相关的。在本研究中,与匹配连接相比,平台转换式基台显示出了较少的种植体周围炎发展。