Postgraduate Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, University Complutense of Madrid, Plaza Ramon y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3789-3800. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03708-4. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
The purpose of this experimental in vivo investigation was to evaluate the influence of modifying the implant surface by adding a monolayer of multi-phosphonate molecules on the development of experimental peri-implantitis.
Eight beagle dogs received 5 tests and 5 control implants each following a split-mouth design 3 months after premolar and molar extraction. On the most mesial implant of each side, a 3-mm buccal dehiscence was artificially created. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced by silk ligatures over a 4-month period; after ligature removal, peri-implantitis was left to progress for another 4 months without plaque control. Clinical, histological, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated.
Radiographically, both implant groups showed a similar bone loss (BL) at the end of the induction and progression phases. BL measured on the histological sections of the test and control groups was 3.14 ± 0.42 mm and 3.26 ± 0.28 mm, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The remaining buccal bone to implant contact (bBIC) percentage of the test and control groups was 59.38 ± 18.62 and 47.44 ± 20.46%, respectively; the difference, however, was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Bone loss observed at dehiscent sites compared to non-dehiscent ones showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).
Addition of a monophosphonate layer to a moderately rough implant surface did not affect development of experimental peri-implantitis.
Influence of implant surface on peri-implantitis may condition implant selection by the clinician, especially on patients with disease risk factors. In that sense, monophosphate layer implants do not show higher peri-implantitis risk than control implants.
本实验旨在体内研究通过添加单层多膦酸分子来修饰种植体表面对实验性种植体周围炎发展的影响。
8 只比格犬采用双侧分牙设计,在磨牙和前磨牙拔除后 3 个月,每只犬接受 5 个实验组和 5 个对照组的植入物。在每侧最近中侧的种植体上,人为造成 3mm 的颊侧缺损。通过丝线结扎,在 4 个月的时间内诱导实验性种植体周围炎;结扎去除后,不进行菌斑控制,让种植体周围炎再发展 4 个月。评估临床、组织学和影像学结果。
影像学检查显示,在诱导和进展阶段结束时,两组种植体均表现出相似的骨丧失(BL)。实验组和对照组的组织学切片上测量的 BL 分别为 3.14±0.42mm 和 3.26±0.28mm,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。实验组和对照组的颊侧骨与种植体接触(bBIC)百分比分别为 59.38±18.62%和 47.44±20.46%,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。与非缺损部位相比,缺损部位的骨丧失无统计学差异(p>0.05)。
在中度粗糙的种植体表面添加单膦酸盐层不会影响实验性种植体周围炎的发展。
种植体表面对种植体周围炎的影响可能会影响临床医生对种植体的选择,尤其是对有疾病危险因素的患者。从这个意义上说,单磷酸盐层种植体的种植体周围炎风险并不高于对照组种植体。