Division of Regenerative and Implant Sciences, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterial Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29(10):1007-1015. doi: 10.1111/clr.13367. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different abutment configurations on peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing.
Two-piece dental implants, 3.5 mm in diameter and 8 mm in length, were placed in four beagle dogs. Two different transmucosal healing abutment configurations were randomly selected: one with a wide emergence profile (WE) (45° angulation with implant long axis) and the other with a narrow emergence profile (NE) (15° angulation with implant long axis). After four months of healing, the animals were sacrificed. Micro-CT scans were taken for mesio-distal analysis; subsequently, the biopsies were prepared for bucco-lingual histometric analyses. Several measurements were taken using the following reference points: marginal mucosal level (MML), apical barrier epithelium (aBE), implant shoulder (IS), marginal bone crest (BC), and first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC).
In the micro-CT analysis, the distance from IS-fBIC was 1.11 ± 0.66 mm for WE and 0.12 ± 0.21 mm for NE (p = 0.004). The IS-BC of WE was -0.54 ± 0.80 mm, whereas NE presented 0.76 ± 0.48 mm (p = 0.002). The histometric analysis showed that both groups presented comparable dimensions of peri-implant biologic width (p > 0.05). However, in the distance from IS to BC, the WE showed a mean distance of -0.66 ± 0.78 mm while NE was 0.06 ± 0.42 mm (p = 0.039); the IS to fBIC was 0.89 ± 0.68 mm for WE while NE was 0.30 ± 0.30 mm (p = 0.041).
The design of the transmucosal component can influence the establishment of the peri-implant biologic width. The flat and wide emergence profile induced an apical displacement of the peri-implant biologic width and more bone loss.
本研究旨在评估不同基台外形对种植体周围软硬组织愈合的影响。
将两段式牙科种植体(直径 3.5mm,长 8mm)植入四只比格犬体内。随机选择两种不同的穿黏膜愈合基台外形:一种为宽出剖面(WE)(与种植体长轴成 45°角),另一种为窄出剖面(NE)(与种植体长轴成 15°角)。愈合 4 个月后,处死动物。进行近远中向 micro-CT 扫描;随后,制备活检进行颊舌向组织学分析。使用以下参考点进行多项测量:边缘黏膜水平(MML)、根尖屏障上皮(aBE)、种植体肩台(IS)、边缘骨嵴(BC)和第一骨-种植体接触点(fBIC)。
在 micro-CT 分析中,WE 组 IS-fBIC 距离为 1.11±0.66mm,NE 组为 0.12±0.21mm(p=0.004)。WE 组 IS-BC 为-0.54±0.80mm,而 NE 组为 0.76±0.48mm(p=0.002)。组织学分析显示,两组种植体周围生物学宽度的尺寸相当(p>0.05)。然而,在 IS 到 BC 的距离方面,WE 组平均距离为-0.66±0.78mm,而 NE 组为 0.06±0.42mm(p=0.039);IS 到 fBIC 的距离 WE 组为 0.89±0.68mm,而 NE 组为 0.30±0.30mm(p=0.041)。
穿黏膜部件的设计可以影响种植体周围生物学宽度的建立。平而宽的出剖面导致种植体周围生物学宽度的根尖移位和更多的骨丧失。