Orthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Department, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Apr;42(4):458-463. doi: 10.1177/1071100720964805. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
The treatment of plantar fasciitis may require surgical intervention in patients with ineffective response to conservative treatment. There is a lack of evidence regarding the differences in clinical outcomes between the endoscopic and the mini-open procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the endoscopic partial plantar fasciotomy via 2 medial portals with mini-open partial plantar fasciotomy for treating refractory plantar fasciitis.
A retrospective analysis was carried out on 62 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis from January 2015 to July 2017. Thirty-three patients received endoscopic partial plantar fasciotomy, while the other 29 received mini-open procedure by patient preference. Two medial portals were used in the endoscopic group while single mini-medial method was used in the open group. All patients were followed up for 24 months. The pain visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, the calcaneodynia score (CS), and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) were employed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the 2 groups.
There was increase in the functional scores (eg, VAS, AOFAS, CS, and SF-36) in both groups recorded at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. The patients in the endoscopic group had better VAS, AOFAS, CS, and SF-36 scores at 3 months after the surgery compared with those of the open group. During the 6-month follow-up, although the 2 groups showed similar VAS and AOFAS, the CS and SF-36 scores of the endoscopic group were significantly higher than those of the open group. During the 1-year and 2-year follow-ups, the endoscopic group gained equivalent VAS, AOFAS, CS, and SF-36 scores compared with those of the open group. The recurrence rate was similar in both groups. Moreover, the patients in the endoscopic group achieved earlier recovery in comparison to those in the open group.
For refractory plantar fasciitis, endoscopic partial plantar fasciotomy via 2 medial portals produced better short-term and equivalent long-term subjective outcomes than the mini-open surgery.
Level II, comparative study.
对于保守治疗无效的足底筋膜炎患者,可能需要手术干预。对于内镜和小切口手术之间的临床结果差异,目前还缺乏证据。本研究的目的是比较通过 2 个内侧入路进行内镜部分足底筋膜切开术与小切口部分足底筋膜切开术治疗难治性足底筋膜炎的临床结果。
对 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月的 62 例难治性足底筋膜炎患者进行回顾性分析。33 例患者接受内镜部分足底筋膜切开术,29 例患者根据患者意愿接受小切口手术。内镜组采用 2 个内侧入路,开放组采用单内侧小切口法。所有患者均随访 24 个月。采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分、跟痛评分(CS)和 36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)评估两组的临床结果。
两组患者术后 3 个月、6 个月、1 年和 2 年的功能评分(如 VAS、AOFAS、CS 和 SF-36)均升高。术后 3 个月,内镜组患者的 VAS、AOFAS、CS 和 SF-36 评分均优于开放组。在 6 个月的随访中,两组患者的 VAS 和 AOFAS 相似,但内镜组的 CS 和 SF-36 评分明显高于开放组。在 1 年和 2 年的随访中,内镜组与开放组的 VAS、AOFAS、CS 和 SF-36 评分相当。两组的复发率相似。此外,与开放组相比,内镜组患者的恢复时间更早。
对于难治性足底筋膜炎,通过 2 个内侧入路进行内镜部分足底筋膜切开术比小切口手术具有更好的短期和长期主观疗效。
II 级,比较研究。