• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足底筋膜炎的手术治疗选择及其疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Surgical treatment options for plantar fasciitis and their effectiveness: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford, RM7 0AG, UK.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4641-4651. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04739-0. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-022-04739-0
PMID:36596990
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, there are no systematic reviews on the utility of surgical management for plantar fasciitis to guide best practice. This review aimed to evaluate the operative options for plantar fasciitis and their effectiveness.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was conducted on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

17 studies involving 865 patients were included. Surgical options considered were open and endoscopic plantar fasciotomy, gastrocnemius release, radiofrequency microtenotomy and dry needling. All interventions resulted in improvement in VAS and AOFAS scores. No major complications were seen from any treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical interventions are effective in providing short- to medium-term symptomatic relief for plantar fasciitis refractory to non-operative management. Current evidence is equivocal regarding treatment choice. Further large randomised studies are required to establish long-term outcomes and a management algorithm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,尚无系统评价探讨足底筋膜炎的手术治疗方法,以指导最佳实践。本研究旨在评估足底筋膜炎的手术治疗选择及其疗效。

方法

按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析。在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行检索策略。使用 ROBINS-I 工具评估质量。

结果

纳入 17 项研究,共 865 例患者。考虑的手术方案包括开放性和内镜下足底筋膜炎切开术、腓肠肌松解术、射频微切开术和干针松解术。所有干预措施均能改善 VAS 和 AOFAS 评分。任何治疗方式均未见严重并发症。

结论

对于经非手术治疗无效的足底筋膜炎,手术干预可有效提供短期至中期的症状缓解。目前尚不清楚哪种治疗方法更优。需要进一步开展大型随机研究以确定长期结局和治疗方案。

证据等级

III 级。

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment options for plantar fasciitis and their effectiveness: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.足底筋膜炎的手术治疗选择及其疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4641-4651. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04739-0. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
2
Injected corticosteroids for treating plantar heel pain in adults.注射用皮质类固醇治疗成人足底足跟痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD009348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009348.pub2.
3
Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review.足底筋膜炎的内镜治疗结果:一项系统评价
Foot Ankle Spec. 2025 Apr;18(2):193-201. doi: 10.1177/19386400221129167. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Gastrocnemius Recession in Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review.顽固性足底筋膜炎中的腓肠肌退缩:系统评价。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr;61(2):396-400. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.10.029. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
10
WITHDRAWN. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain.撤回。治疗足跟足底疼痛的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD000416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000416.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Does local steroid injection have a prognostic value for endoscopic plantar fascia release in chronic plantar fasciopathy?局部类固醇注射对慢性足底筋膜炎的内镜下足底筋膜松解术是否具有预后价值?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jun 9;26(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08816-4.
2
Endoscopic Debridement, Ostectomy, Release, and Radiofrequency: A Fully Endoscopic Technique for Treating Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis.内镜下清创、截骨、松解及射频治疗:一种治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的全内镜技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Aug 1;13(12):103150. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103150. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
REPORT-PFP: a consensus from the International Patellofemoral Research Network to improve REPORTing of quantitative PatelloFemoral Pain studies.REPORT-PFP:国际髌股研究网络关于改进髌股疼痛定量研究报告的共识。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Oct;55(20):1135-1143. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103700. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
2
Endoscopic Partial Plantar Fasciotomy via 2 Medial Portals vs Mini-Open Procedure for Refractory Plantar Fasciitis.经 2 个内侧入路内镜下足底筋膜部分切开术与小切口手术治疗难治性足底筋膜炎的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Apr;42(4):458-463. doi: 10.1177/1071100720964805. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Comparison of the therapeutic outcomes between open plantar fascia release and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of intractable plantar fasciitis.
创新性治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的方法:脉冲射频消融与手术干预的比较。
Int Orthop. 2024 Oct;48(10):2719-2726. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06261-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Clinical Study of a Four-Step Program for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis with Bone Spurs.临床研究骨刺性足底筋膜炎四步疗法。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun;16(6):1374-1380. doi: 10.1111/os.14059. Epub 2024 May 1.
5
Effectiveness of therapeutic ultrasound on reducing pain intensity and functional disability in patients with plantar fasciitis: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.治疗性超声波在减轻足底筋膜炎患者疼痛强度和功能障碍中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 22;12:e17147. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17147. eCollection 2024.
开放足底筋膜松解术与经皮射频消融术治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的疗效比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 18;15(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-1582-2.
4
Proximal Medial Gastrocnemius Release Versus Open Plantar Fasciotomy for the Surgical Treatment in Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis.近内侧腓肠肌松解术与开放式足底筋膜炎切开术治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Mar;41(3):267-274. doi: 10.1177/1071100719891979. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
5
Preliminary Report on the Role of Dry Needling Versus Corticosteroid Injection, an Effective Treatment Method for Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.干针疗法与皮质类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的作用初步报告:一项随机对照试验,一种有效的治疗方法
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Mar;58(2):301-305. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.058.
6
Radiofrequency Microtenotomy with Concurrent Gastrocnemius Recession Improves Postoperative Vitality Scores in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis.射频微切开术联合跟腱下滑囊切除术治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎可改善术后活力评分。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2018 Dec;47(12):509-515.
7
Plantar fasciopathy: A current concepts review.足底筋膜炎:当前概念综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Aug 29;3(8):485-493. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170080. eCollection 2018 Aug.
8
Proximal Medial Gastrocnemius Recession and Stretching Versus Stretching as Treatment of Chronic Plantar Heel Pain.内侧近端腓肠肌切开术与伸展术治疗慢性足底跟痛:伸展术与切开术的对比。
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Dec;39(12):1423-1431. doi: 10.1177/1071100718794659. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for plantar heel pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.足底足跟痛治疗方案的比较效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;53(3):182-194. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098998. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
A generalized pairwise modelling framework for network meta-analysis.一种用于网络荟萃分析的广义成对模型框架。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Dec;16(4):187-194. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000140.