Suppr超能文献

老年人基本药物的合理使用:世卫组织基本药物清单和 PIM 标准的比较。

Appropriate use of essential medicines in the elderly: a comparison of the WHO essential medicines list and PIM criteria.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Zhengzhou University, No.100 Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;77(4):509-516. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03038-0. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The elderly are not only threatened by bad medicines (overtreatment) but also by undertreatment with "good" medicines. Symmetry is required in any patient-centred approach to properly treat older people. The purpose of this study was to perfect the development of an EML and criteria according to the advantages of each and promote the appropriate use of essential medicines in the elderly.

METHOD

We compared the EML with four PIM criteria and calculated the proportion of essential medicines included in the criteria. We also summarized the rationale for including medicines in each criterion and analysed higher risk drugs and drug risks.

RESULTS

Of essential medicines, 26% are included in at least one criterion as PIM. In 11 drug categories of the EML, more than 50% of drugs of each category are included in at least one criterion, and in four categories, all drugs are included. The potentially inappropriate essential medicines (PIEMs) for the elderly focus on cardiovascular drugs and central nervous system drugs. Fifty-nine drugs have been explicitly identified as increasing the risk of falls, increasing mortality and/or having inappropriate long-term use, and the main risk of PIEMs is falls (30.3% of PIEMs). Additionally, 17.9% of essential medicines are labelled as positive drugs in START and/or FORTA (A/B).

CONCLUSION

Improving medication information for the elderly in the EML and establishing an essential medicines list for the elderly will promote appropriate drug use in older people worldwide.

摘要

目的

老年人不仅受到劣质药物(过度治疗)的威胁,也受到“优质”药物治疗不足的威胁。在以患者为中心的任何方法中,都需要对称性来正确治疗老年人。本研究的目的是完善 EML 的开发并根据每种方法的优势制定标准,并促进老年人合理使用基本药物。

方法

我们将 EML 与四个 PIM 标准进行了比较,并计算了纳入标准的基本药物的比例。我们还总结了纳入每个标准的药物的基本原理,并分析了高风险药物和药物风险。

结果

在基本药物中,有 26%的药物至少被一个标准列为 PIM。在 EML 的 11 个药物类别中,每个类别的超过 50%的药物至少被一个标准纳入,在四个类别中,所有药物都被纳入。老年人潜在不适当的基本药物(PIEMs)主要集中在心血管药物和中枢神经系统药物。已经明确确定了 59 种药物会增加跌倒风险、增加死亡率和/或长期使用不当的风险,PIEMs 的主要风险是跌倒(占 PIEMs 的 30.3%)。此外,17.9%的基本药物在 START 和/或 FORTA(A/B)中被标记为阳性药物。

结论

改善 EML 中老年人的用药信息,并为老年人建立基本药物清单,将促进全世界老年人合理用药。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验