Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2553-2565. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01440-y. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
This study investigated the impact of encoding scenarios on sequential memory, specifcally testing the benefit of imagining a spatial context when learning a list of items. In Experiment 1, participants studied sequences of visually presented items after imagining a spatial context or a preparatory cue. At test, participants made recency judgments (Which came first?) on pairs of items from the studied sequences. These test pairs varied in the studied temporal distance (studied with 0, 1 or 2 intervening items between the pair) and whether presented in a manner that was 'spatially congruent' with their studied order. A congruent test pair was one in which the first item from the sequence was presented on the left and the second item presented on the right. The results were that imagining a spatial context at encoding led to more accurate recency judgments than when no encoding context was provided. In addition, test pairs that included items studied farther apart (2 intervening items) were more accurately judged than test pairs with items studied closer together (0 or 1 intervening items). Experiment 2 utilized the same design to compare the effect of imagining a spatial context versus elaborating on a concept when encoding item sequences. Interestingly, the effect of these encoding contexts on recency judgments depended on both the temporal distance and congruency of the test pairs. Imagining a spatial context at encoding led to more accurate recency judgments than when thinking about a concept at encoding for incongruent test pairs and congruent test pairs studied without intervening items. These findings provide new insight into how encoding strategies, specifically those that recruit imagining spatial contexts, alter the way temporal associations are retrieved from memory.
本研究考察了编码场景对序列记忆的影响,特别是测试了在学习一系列项目时想象空间背景的益处。在实验 1 中,参与者在想象空间背景或预备线索后研究了视觉呈现的项目序列。在测试中,参与者对来自学习序列的一对项目进行近因判断(哪一个先出现?)。这些测试对在学习的时间距离上有所不同(在对一对项目的学习中有 0、1 或 2 个中间项目),并且呈现方式是否与它们学习的顺序“空间一致”。一致的测试对是指序列中的第一个项目在左侧呈现,第二个项目在右侧呈现。结果表明,在编码时想象空间背景比不提供编码上下文导致更准确的近因判断。此外,包括学习间隔较远的项目(2 个中间项目)的测试对比包括学习间隔较近的项目(0 或 1 个中间项目)的测试对更准确地被判断。实验 2 使用相同的设计来比较在编码项目序列时想象空间背景与详细阐述概念的效果。有趣的是,这些编码场景对近因判断的影响取决于测试对的时间距离和一致性。对于不一致的测试对和没有中间项目学习的一致测试对,在编码时想象空间背景比在编码时思考概念导致更准确的近因判断。这些发现为编码策略如何改变从记忆中检索时间关联的方式提供了新的见解,特别是那些利用想象空间背景的策略。