Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01682-y. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
We memorize our daily life experiences, which are often multisensory in nature, by segmenting them into distinct event models, in accordance with perceived contextual or situational changes. However, very little is known about how multisensory boundaries affect segmentation, as most studies have focused on unisensory (visual or audio) segmentation. In three experiments, we investigated the effect of multisensory boundaries on segmentation in memory and perception. In Experiment 1, participants encoded lists of pictures while audio and visual contexts changed synchronously or asynchronously. After each list, we tested recognition and temporal associative memory for pictures that were encoded in the same audio-visual context or that crossed a synchronous or an asynchronous multisensory change. We found no effect of multisensory synchrony for recognition memory: synchronous and asynchronous changes similarly impaired recognition for pictures encoded at those changes, compared to pictures encoded further away from those changes. Multisensory synchrony did affect temporal associative memory, which was worse for pictures encoded at synchronous than at asynchronous changes. Follow up experiments showed that this effect was not due to the higher dimensionality of multisensory over unisensory contexts (Experiment 2), nor that it was due to the temporal unpredictability of contextual changes inherent to Experiment 1 (Experiment 3). We argue that participants formed situational expectations through multisensory synchronicity, such that synchronous multisensory changes deviated more strongly from those expectations than asynchronous changes. We discuss our findings in light of supportive and conflicting findings of uni- and multi-sensory segmentation.
我们通过将日常生活经验分割成不同的事件模型来记忆它们,这些经验通常是多感官的,这符合感知到的上下文或情境变化。然而,对于多感官边界如何影响分割,我们知之甚少,因为大多数研究都集中在单感官(视觉或听觉)分割上。在三个实验中,我们研究了多感官边界对记忆和感知中的分割的影响。在实验 1 中,参与者在音频和视觉上下文同步或异步变化的情况下对图片列表进行编码。在每个列表之后,我们测试了在相同的视听环境中编码的图片的识别和时间联想记忆,或者测试了在同步或异步多感官变化中交叉的图片的识别和时间联想记忆。我们没有发现多感官同步对识别记忆有影响:与在更远的地方编码的图片相比,同步和异步变化同样会损害在这些变化处编码的图片的识别。多感官同步确实影响了时间联想记忆,对于在同步变化处编码的图片,其记忆效果比在异步变化处编码的图片差。后续实验表明,这种影响不是由于多感官上下文比单感官上下文的维度更高(实验 2),也不是由于实验 1 中上下文变化固有的时间不可预测性(实验 3)造成的。我们认为,参与者通过多感官同步形成了情境期望,因此,同步的多感官变化比异步变化更强烈地偏离了这些期望。我们根据单和多感官分割的支持和冲突的发现来讨论我们的发现。