Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0242127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242127. eCollection 2020.
Reported mortality of hospitalised Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients varies substantially, particularly in critically ill patients. So far COVID-19 in-hospital mortality and modes of death under state of the art care have not been systematically studied.
This retrospective observational monocenter cohort study was performed after implementation of a non-restricted, dynamic tertiary care model at the University Medical Center Freiburg, an experienced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation (ECMO) referral center. All hospitalised patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, secondary endpoints included major complications and modes of death. A multistate analysis and a Cox regression analysis for competing risk models were performed. Modes of death were determined by two independent reviewers.
Between February 25, and May 8, 213 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 65 years, 129 patients (61%) were male. 70 patients (33%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), of which 57 patients (81%) received mechanical ventilation and 23 patients (33%) ECMO support. Using multistate methodology, the estimated probability to die within 90 days after COVID-19 onset was 24% in the whole cohort. If the levels of care at time of study entry were accounted for, the probabilities to die were 16% if the patient was initially on a regular ward, 47% if in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 57% if mechanical ventilation was required at study entry. Age ≥65 years and male sex were predictors for in-hospital death. Predominant complications-as judged by two independent reviewers-determining modes of death were multi-organ failure, septic shock and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.
In a dynamic care model COVID-19-related in-hospital mortality remained very high. In the absence of potent antiviral agents, strategies to alleviate or prevent the identified complications should be investigated. In this context, multistate analyses enable comparison of models-of-care and treatment strategies and allow estimation and allocation of health care resources.
报告的住院 COVID-19(新冠肺炎)患者死亡率差异很大,尤其是在重症患者中。迄今为止,COVID-19 的住院死亡率和在最先进的治疗下的死亡模式尚未得到系统研究。
本回顾性观察性单中心队列研究在弗莱堡大学医学中心实施无限制、动态的三级护理模式后进行,该中心是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和体外膜氧合(ECMO)的经验丰富的转诊中心。所有经 PCR 确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的住院患者均被纳入研究。主要终点是住院死亡率,次要终点包括主要并发症和死亡模式。进行多状态分析和 Cox 回归分析以用于竞争风险模型。通过两名独立评审员确定死亡模式。
在 2 月 25 日至 5 月 8 日期间,共纳入 213 名患者进行分析。中位年龄为 65 岁,129 名患者(61%)为男性。70 名患者(33%)被收入重症监护病房(ICU),其中 57 名患者(81%)接受机械通气,23 名患者(33%)接受 ECMO 支持。使用多状态方法,在整个队列中,COVID-19 发病后 90 天内死亡的估计概率为 24%。如果在研究入组时考虑到护理水平,那么如果患者最初在普通病房,死亡概率为 16%;如果在 ICU,死亡概率为 47%;如果在研究入组时需要机械通气,死亡概率为 57%。年龄≥65 岁和男性是住院死亡的预测因素。两名独立评审员判断的主要并发症-决定死亡模式的因素是多器官衰竭、感染性休克以及血栓栓塞和出血性并发症。
在动态护理模式下,COVID-19 相关的住院死亡率仍然很高。在没有有效抗病毒药物的情况下,应研究减轻或预防已确定并发症的策略。在这种情况下,多状态分析可以比较护理模式和治疗策略,并允许估计和分配卫生保健资源。