Suppr超能文献

动态血压监测耐受性的性别和年龄差异。

Sex and Age Differences in Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Tolerability.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Program, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2021 Apr 20;34(4):335-338. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa182.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines endorse using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. However, ABPM is not always tolerated by patients, and differences between individuals according to age and sex remain unexplored.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective, single-arm clinical trial (NCT03920956) that evaluated the feasibility of an ABPM service provided at 2 community pharmacies. Tolerability was assessed using a previously published survey, which included 7 yes/no questions and 8 answered on a scale of 0-10. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analyses were used to summarize the data for the patient surveys and to describe sex and age differences in device tolerability.

RESULTS

Of the 52 subjects enrolled, 50 (96%) completed the survey; half were female with a mean (SD) age of 57.5 years (15.8). Chi-square analyses showed that compared with their male counterparts, females were more likely to find the monitor cumbersome to wear (76.2% vs. 40%, P = 0.014). Subjects under 55 years of age were more likely to be disturbed by the noise of the monitor during driving (38.1% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.005) and at other times (35.0% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.029), and to find the monitor embarrassing to wear (33.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ABPM was generally well-tolerated overall, we did identify age and sex differences in tolerability. These factors should be considered to ensure patient acceptance and tolerability of ABPM.

摘要

背景

临床实践指南支持使用动态血压监测(ABPM)来诊断和治疗高血压。然而,ABPM 并不总是被患者所耐受,且个体之间的差异(依据年龄和性别)仍未被探索。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、单臂临床试验(NCT03920956)的事后分析,该试验评估了在 2 家社区药店提供 ABPM 服务的可行性。使用先前发表的一项调查来评估可耐受性,该调查包括 7 个是/否问题和 8 个 0-10 分制的回答。使用描述性统计和卡方分析来总结患者调查的数据,并描述设备可耐受性方面的性别和年龄差异。

结果

在纳入的 52 名受试者中,有 50 名(96%)完成了调查;其中一半为女性,平均(标准差)年龄为 57.5 岁(15.8)。卡方分析显示,与男性相比,女性更倾向于认为监测器佩戴起来不方便(76.2% vs. 40%,P = 0.014)。年龄小于 55 岁的受试者更有可能在驾驶时(38.1% vs. 4.2%,P = 0.005)和其他时间(35.0% vs. 8.3%,P = 0.029)被监测器的噪音干扰,也更倾向于认为监测器佩戴起来尴尬(33.3% vs. 7.1%,P = 0.019)。

结论

尽管总体而言 ABPM 耐受性良好,但我们确实发现了可耐受性方面的年龄和性别差异。这些因素应予以考虑,以确保患者接受和耐受 ABPM。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验