Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Department of Geriatrics, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Dec 12;2022:3167518. doi: 10.1155/2022/3167518. eCollection 2022.
Detection of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) that was defined for treated hypertensive individuals who had normal office blood pressure (BP) but elevated ambulatory BP remains largely challenging. Arterial stiffness is one of the leading risk markers for hypertension and can be clinically assessed by the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). This study aimed to evaluate the association between CAVI and MUCH. A total of 155 hypertensive patients were included with their office BP levels and ambulatory BP monitoring measurements, which were divided into controlled hypertension (CH), MUCH, and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH) groups, respectively. There were 48 patients with CH, 56 patients with MUCH, and 51 patients with SUCH. Both MUCH and SUCH groups had a significantly higher CAVI than the CH group (9.05 (8.20-9.91) vs. 8.33 (7.75-9.15), = 0.017, and 9.75 (8.35-10.50) vs. 8.33 (7.75-9.15), = 0.002, respectively). There was no significant difference in CAVI values between the MUCH and SUCH groups. Multinomial logistic regression analysis exhibited that compared with the CH group, increased CAVI levels were positively associated with the presence of MUCH and SUCH (OR 2.046, 95% CI (1.239-3.381), = 0.005; OR 2.215, 95% CI (1.310-3.747), = 0.003) after adjusting for confounders. However, there was a similar trend of the CAVI in the MUCH and SUCH groups (OR 0.924, 95% CI (0.629-1.356), = 0.686). In summary, our findings support, for the first time, the novel notion that CAVI as an arterial stiffness parameter is an independent risk factor for MUCH, being equally important to MUCH and SUCH. When the assessed CAVI is high in hypertensive patients with normotensive office BP levels, it is necessary to further investigate with a 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring to estimate the longstanding BP control. CAVI may be used as a noninvasive indicator to identify patients with MUCH earlier.
隐匿性未控制高血压(MUCH)的检测对接受治疗的高血压患者具有重要意义,这些患者的诊室血压正常,但动态血压升高。动脉僵硬度是高血压的主要风险标志物之一,可以通过心血管踝血管指数(CAVI)进行临床评估。本研究旨在评估 CAVI 与 MUCH 的相关性。共纳入 155 例高血压患者,测量其诊室血压和动态血压监测值,分别分为控制良好的高血压(CH)、MUCH 和持续未控制的高血压(SUCH)组。CH 组 48 例,MUCH 组 56 例,SUCH 组 51 例。MUCH 和 SUCH 组的 CAVI 均明显高于 CH 组(9.05(8.20-9.91)比 8.33(7.75-9.15), = 0.017,9.75(8.35-10.50)比 8.33(7.75-9.15), = 0.002)。MUCH 和 SUCH 组之间的 CAVI 值无显著差异。多分类逻辑回归分析显示,与 CH 组相比,CAVI 水平升高与 MUCH 和 SUCH 的发生呈正相关(OR 2.046,95%CI(1.239-3.381), = 0.005;OR 2.215,95%CI(1.310-3.747), = 0.003),调整混杂因素后。然而,在 MUCH 和 SUCH 组中,CAVI 也呈现出类似的趋势(OR 0.924,95%CI(0.629-1.356), = 0.686)。综上所述,本研究首次支持动脉僵硬度参数 CAVI 是 MUCH 的独立危险因素这一新颖观点,与 MUCH 和 SUCH 同等重要。当诊室血压正常的高血压患者的 CAVI 值较高时,有必要进一步通过 24 小时动态血压监测进行检查,以评估长期血压控制情况。CAVI 可作为一种非侵入性指标,更早地识别 MUCH 患者。