Intensive Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):228-239. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004724.
In this study, we evaluated the inflammatory response in patients with severe acute respiratory infection due to the Middle East respiratory syndrome and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome and assessed the presence of distinct inflammatory subphenotypes using latent class analysis.
Prospective cohort study.
A tertiary care ICU in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Consecutive critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection.
None.
We measured cytokines on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 of ICU stay. We included 116 patients (40 with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and 76 with non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection). On ICU day 1, both patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection had higher levels of interleukin-3, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-17A, eotaxin, and epidermal growth factor compared with healthy controls. There were no differences in cytokines over time between patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection. Using day 1 cytokine levels, latent class analysis categorized patients into two subphenotypes: subphenotype 1 (n = 74 [64%]) and subphenotype 2 (n = 42 [36%]); the latter had significantly higher levels of interleukin-1β, interleukin-1ra, interleukin-2, interleukin-6, interleukin-7, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, interleukin-12p70, interleukin-15, interleukin-17A, inducible protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, interferon-α, and interferon-γ. Although baseline characteristics were not different between the two subphenotypes, patients in the subphenotype 2 had higher ICU mortality compared with the subphenotype 1 (18/42 [43%] vs 17/74 [23%]; p = 0.03).
One third of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection demonstrated a subphenotype characterized by increased proinflammatory cytokines, consistent with cytokine storm. Further research is needed to examine whether immunomodulators have differential effects based on inflammatory subphenotypes.
本研究旨在评估中东呼吸综合征和非中东呼吸综合征所致重症急性呼吸道感染患者的炎症反应,并通过潜在类别分析评估是否存在不同的炎症亚表型。
前瞻性队列研究。
沙特阿拉伯利雅得的一家三级护理重症监护病房。
经实验室确诊的中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染和非中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染的连续危重症患者。
无。
我们在入住重症监护病房的第 1、3、7 和 14 天测量细胞因子。我们纳入了 116 名患者(中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染 40 名,非中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染 76 名)。入住重症监护病房第 1 天,与健康对照组相比,中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染和非中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染患者的白细胞介素-3、白细胞介素-4、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-8、白细胞介素-17A、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子和表皮生长因子水平均较高。在中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染和非中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染患者中,细胞因子在时间上无差异。使用第 1 天的细胞因子水平,潜在类别分析将患者分为两种亚表型:亚表型 1(n = 74 [64%])和亚表型 2(n = 42 [36%]);后者白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-1ra、白细胞介素-2、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-7、白细胞介素-8、白细胞介素-10、白细胞介素-12p70、白细胞介素-15、白细胞介素-17A、诱导蛋白-10、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1、巨噬细胞炎症蛋白-1α、巨噬细胞炎症蛋白-1β、肿瘤坏死因子-α、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子、粒细胞集落刺激因子、干扰素-α和干扰素-γ水平显著较高。尽管两种亚表型之间的基线特征无差异,但亚表型 2 的患者 ICU 死亡率高于亚表型 1(18/42 [43%] vs 17/74 [23%];p = 0.03)。
三分之一的中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染和非中东呼吸综合征重症急性呼吸道感染危重症患者表现出一种亚表型,其特征为促炎细胞因子增加,符合细胞因子风暴。需要进一步研究免疫调节剂是否基于炎症亚表型产生不同的作用。