Chua Wei De Kenneth
Department of Otolaryngology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Audiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Jan;25(1):8-13. doi: 10.7874/jao.2020.00213. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
In 2013, the Singapore government reviewed and expanded the Senior Mobility Fund (SMF) to provide subsidy for assistive devices, including hearing aids (HA). While SMF has improved accessibility to HA, its impact on HA acquisition has not been determined. The study aims to elucidate the influence of SMF on HA acquisition and the relationship between financial funding and compliance to HA use.
Retrospective review of 643 patients seen between January 2017 to January 2018 at the earnose and throat specialist outpatient clinic, who were referred for a hearing aid evaluation. Of the 643 patients, 109 patients with baseline hearing handicap (HH) scores recorded, and no formal diagnosis of cognitive impairment were included. The patients were grouped according to SMF eligibility and clinical data were obtained.
The odds ratio for acquiring HA was significantly higher with SMF, regardless of HH scores. When looking at actual degree of hearing loss (DHL), HA uptake was significantly higher in the least severe of DHL categories. There is no relationship between SMF and compliance to HA use. However, HH score is positively correlated with data log in regression analyses.
SMF appears to influence HA acquisition. Especially in financially funded patients with low self-perceived HH, the benefits of HA may be underappreciated given the few hours of HA use. Further studies are warranted to investigate the impact of financial funding on outcomes of HA users to help policy planners and clinicians be prudent in the utilization of SMF.
2013年,新加坡政府对老年人行动基金(SMF)进行了审查并扩大了其范围,以提供包括助听器(HA)在内的辅助设备补贴。虽然SMF提高了获得HA的可及性,但其对HA购置的影响尚未确定。本研究旨在阐明SMF对HA购置的影响以及资金资助与HA使用依从性之间的关系。
回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年1月在耳鼻喉专科门诊就诊并被转诊进行助听器评估的643例患者。在这643例患者中,纳入了109例记录了基线听力障碍(HH)评分且未正式诊断为认知障碍的患者。根据SMF资格对患者进行分组并获取临床数据。
无论HH评分如何,获得HA的优势比在有SMF时显著更高。当观察实际听力损失程度(DHL)时,在最轻微的DHL类别中HA的使用显著更高。SMF与HA使用依从性之间没有关系。然而,在回归分析中HH评分与数据记录呈正相关。
SMF似乎会影响HA的购置。特别是在经济资助的自我感知HH较低的患者中,鉴于HA使用时间较少,HA的益处可能未得到充分认识。有必要进一步研究资金资助对HA使用者结局的影响,以帮助政策制定者和临床医生谨慎使用SMF。