• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助听器验配结果:国际助听器结果量表(IOI-HA)瑞典语译本的临床应用及心理测量特性

Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).

作者信息

Brännström K Jonas, Wennerström Ingegerd

机构信息

ENT Department, Section of Audiology, Malmö University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Sep;21(8):512-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3.

DOI:10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3
PMID:21034698
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) is a seven-item hearing-specific questionnaire. It was developed with the purpose of evaluating the efficacy of hearing aid rehabilitation. Few psychometric properties have been presented for a Swedish translation of the IOI-HA. Furthermore, previous studies have examined the IOI-HA in mainly sensorineural hearing losses, and we do not know how the type of hearing loss affects the outcome.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the hearing aid fitting outcome measured in a clinical setting using a Swedish translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), to determine the psychometric properties of the translation, and to examine how a number of demographic variables such as type of hearing loss affect the outcome.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A descriptive and correlational study in a retrospective sample.

STUDY SAMPLE

Two hundred and twenty-four (107 females and 117 males; ages 27-94 yr with an average of 66.1 yr) first-time hearing aid users.

INTERVENTION

Mostly digital hearing aids (97.8%) were fitted monaurally (60%) or binaurally (40%) between 2007 and 2009.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The subjects were mailed the IOI-HA questionnaire six months after their final appointment, and the completed questionnaire was returned by mail to the clinic. The psychometric properties were evaluated and compared to previous studies using the IOI-HA. The associations between the outcome scores and a number of demographic variables (age, gender, degree of hearing loss, type of hearing loss, number of hearing aids, and type of hearing aids) were examined. Based on the pure tone audiograms, the subjects were divided into three groups; those with conductive hearing losses, sensorineural hearing losses, and mixed hearing losses. For these groups, the differences in outcome measured as IOI-HA were examined.

RESULTS

The psychometric properties of the present translation of the IOI-HA showed resemblance in many aspects to previous reports. Furthermore, the type of hearing loss seems to affect the IOI-HA outcome. Hearing loss increases with increasing age, and hearing aid use increases with increasing degree of hearing loss. Subjects with sensorineural hearing losses show significantly poorer scores on items concerning introspective aspects of the outcome in comparison to subjects with mixed hearing losses and subjects with conductive hearing losses. Monaurally fitted subjects tend to report lower scores on average, but monaural or binaural hearing aid fitting do not significantly affect the subjective outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of the present Swedish translation of the IOI-HA show resemblance in many aspects to previous reports, but the differences observed could be due to differences in the study populations. Overall, the demographic variables examined could not be used as predictors for the hearing aid fitting outcome, and more reliable predictors need to be identified.

摘要

背景

国际助听器效果量表(IOI-HA)是一份包含七个项目的听力专项调查问卷。其编制目的是评估助听器康复效果。目前关于IOI-HA瑞典语译本的心理测量学特性研究较少。此外,以往研究主要针对感音神经性听力损失人群对IOI-HA进行了考察,而我们并不清楚听力损失类型如何影响结果。

目的

使用国际助听器效果量表(IOI-HA)的瑞典语译本评估临床环境下的助听器验配效果,确定该译本的心理测量学特性,并考察一些人口统计学变量(如听力损失类型)如何影响结果。

研究设计

对回顾性样本进行描述性和相关性研究。

研究样本

224名首次使用助听器的用户(107名女性和117名男性;年龄27 - 94岁,平均66.1岁)。

干预措施

2007年至2009年间,大多数(97.8%)用户佩戴的是数字助听器,单耳佩戴比例为60%,双耳佩戴比例为40%。

数据收集与分析

在受试者最后一次就诊六个月后,通过邮件向他们发放IOI-HA问卷,完成的问卷通过邮件返回诊所。评估心理测量学特性,并与以往使用IOI-HA的研究进行比较。考察结果得分与一些人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、听力损失程度、听力损失类型、助听器数量和助听器类型)之间的关联。根据纯音听力图,将受试者分为三组:传导性听力损失组、感音神经性听力损失组和混合性听力损失组。针对这些组,考察以IOI-HA衡量的结果差异。

结果

目前IOI-HA瑞典语译本的心理测量学特性在许多方面与以往报告相似。此外,听力损失类型似乎会影响IOI-HA结果。听力损失随年龄增长而增加,助听器使用随听力损失程度增加而增加。与混合性听力损失受试者和传导性听力损失受试者相比,感音神经性听力损失受试者在结果内省方面的项目得分明显更低。单耳佩戴的受试者平均得分往往较低,但单耳或双耳佩戴助听器对主观结果没有显著影响。

结论

目前IOI-HA瑞典语译本的心理测量学特性在许多方面与以往报告相似,但观察到的差异可能归因于研究人群的不同。总体而言,所考察的人口统计学变量不能用作助听器验配结果的预测指标,需要确定更可靠的预测指标。

相似文献

1
Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).助听器验配结果:国际助听器结果量表(IOI-HA)瑞典语译本的临床应用及心理测量特性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Sep;21(8):512-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3.
2
Prediction of IOI-HA scores using speech reception thresholds and speech discrimination scores in quiet.使用安静环境下的言语接受阈值和言语辨别分数预测IOI-HA分数。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):154-63. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.2.4.
3
International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids: Data From a Large Swedish Quality Register Database.助听器国际成果量表:来自瑞典大型质量登记数据库的数据。
Am J Audiol. 2017 Oct 12;26(3S):443-450. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0123.
4
Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a veteran sample.对退伍军人样本中助听器国际成效量表的评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):374-80. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.5.
5
Hearing aid outcomes: effects of gender and experience on patients' use and satisfaction.助听器效果:性别和经验对患者使用情况及满意度的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;20(7):422-32; quiz 459-60. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.7.4.
6
Comparison of psychometric properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-hA) in various studies.不同研究中助听器国际成效量表(IOI-hA)心理测量特性的比较。
Int J Audiol. 2005 Feb;44(2):102-9. doi: 10.1080/14992020500031223.
7
Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).国际助听器成效量表(IOI-HA)丹麦语修订译本的心理测量特性。
Int J Audiol. 2014 May;53(5):302-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.874049. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
8
Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Swedish Translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.《瑞典版简化助听器获益量表的临床应用及心理测量学特性》
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Oct;31(9):656-665. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718702. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Psychometric properties of the Kannada version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).《国际助听器结局量表(IOI-HA)卡纳达语版的心理测量学特性》。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):1039-1045. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1884910. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
Translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids into Portuguese from Portugal.将助听器国际成果量表从英文翻译成葡萄牙语(葡萄牙地区)。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 6;7(3):e013784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013784.

引用本文的文献

1
French Adaptation and Validation of the International Outcome Inventory on Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) Questionnaire.《国际助听器效果问卷(IOI-HA)的法语改编与验证》
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 6;15(4):97. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040097.
2
Factors correlated with hearing aids adherence in older adults: a prospective controlled study.老年人助听器佩戴相关因素的前瞻性对照研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jun;52(6):3000605241232549. doi: 10.1177/03000605241232549.
3
A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of motivational interviewing in new hearing aid users (MI-HAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
一项评估动机性访谈对新助听器使用者影响的随机对照试验(MI-HAT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 22;24(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07352-7.
4
Factors associated with the efficiency of hearing aids for patients with age-related hearing loss.与年龄相关性听力损失患者助听器效率相关的因素。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Feb 26;14:485-492. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S190651. eCollection 2019.
5
The initial evaluation of an Internet-based support system for audiologists and first-time hearing aid clients.针对听力学家和初次使用助听器的客户的基于互联网的支持系统的初步评估。
Internet Interv. 2016 Jan 26;4:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.01.002. eCollection 2016 May.
6
Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome.助听器效果的自我报告与认知测量之间的关系。
Speech Lang Hear. 2013 Dec;16(4):197-207. doi: 10.1179/205057113X13782848890774.
7
Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).国际助听器成效量表(IOI-HA)丹麦语修订译本的心理测量特性。
Int J Audiol. 2014 May;53(5):302-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.874049. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
8
The use of research questionnaires with hearing impaired adults: online vs. paper-and-pencil administration.针对成年听力障碍者使用研究问卷:在线施测与纸笔施测
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2012 Oct 29;12:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-12-12.
9
A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools.自 1999 年以来,对测量和报告老年人助听器使用情况的研究进行系统评价:测量工具的描述性总结。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031831. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantations: experience at National University Hospital Singapore.新加坡国立大学医院中 Vibrant Soundbridge 中耳植入术的经验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Sep;269(9):2137-43. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2000-0. Epub 2012 Mar 28.