Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Emergency Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, CH 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 9;17(21):8254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218254.
Measuring the performance of emergency medical dispatch tools used in paramedic-staffed emergency medical communication centres (EMCCs) is rarely performed. The objectives of our study were, therefore, to measure the performance and accuracy of Geneva's dispatch system based on symptom assessment, in particular, the performance of ambulance dispatching with lights and sirens (L&S) and to measure the effect of adding specific protocols for each symptom. We performed a prospective observational study including all emergency calls received at Geneva's EMCC (Switzerland) from 1 January 2014 to 1 July 2019. The risk levels selected during the emergency calls were compared to a reference standard, based on the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) scale, dichotomized to severe patient condition (NACA ≥ 4) or stable patient condition (NACA < 4) in the field. The symptom-based dispatch performance was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Contingency tables and a Fagan nomogram were used to measure the performance of the dispatch with or without L&S. Measurements were carried out by symptom, and a group of symptoms with specific protocols was compared to a group without specific protocols. We found an acceptable area under the ROC curve of 0.7474, 95%CI (0.7448-0.7503) for the 148,979 assessments included in the study. Where the severity prevalence was 21%, 95%CI (20.8-21.2). The sensitivity of the L&S dispatch was 87.5%, 95%CI (87.1-87.8); and the specificity was 47.3%, 95%CI (47.0-47.6). When symptom-specific assessment protocols were used, the accuracy of the assessments was slightly improved. Performance measurement of Geneva's symptom-based dispatch system using standard diagnostic test performance measurement tools was possible. The performance was found to be comparable to other emergency medical dispatch systems using the same reference standard. However, the implementation of specific assessment protocols for each symptom may improve the accuracy of symptom-based dispatch systems.
测量在配备医护人员的紧急医疗通讯中心(EMCC)中使用的紧急医疗调度工具的性能很少进行。因此,我们的研究目的是测量基于症状评估的日内瓦调度系统的性能和准确性,特别是带有灯光和警笛的救护车调度的性能(L&S),并测量添加每个症状的特定协议的效果。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,该研究包括 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 1 日期间在日内瓦 EMCC(瑞士)收到的所有紧急电话。在紧急呼叫期间选择的风险级别与参考标准进行了比较,该标准基于美国国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)量表,在现场分为严重患者病情(NACA≥4)或稳定患者病情(NACA<4)。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估基于症状的调度性能。使用列联表和 Fagan 图示仪来测量是否使用 L&S 进行调度的性能。通过症状进行测量,并将具有特定协议的症状组与没有特定协议的症状组进行比较。我们发现,在研究中包括的 148979 次评估中,ROC 曲线下的面积为 0.7474,95%CI(0.7448-0.7503)。在严重程度患病率为 21%,95%CI(20.8-21.2)的情况下。L&S 调度的灵敏度为 87.5%,95%CI(87.1-87.8);特异性为 47.3%,95%CI(47.0-47.6)。当使用特定于症状的评估协议时,评估的准确性略有提高。使用标准诊断测试性能测量工具对日内瓦基于症状的调度系统进行性能测量是可行的。与使用相同参考标准的其他紧急医疗调度系统相比,其性能是可比的。然而,为每个症状实施特定的评估协议可能会提高基于症状的调度系统的准确性。