Suppr超能文献

肠道微生物群与肠易激综合征饮食的关联,以及低 FODMAP 饮食和益生菌的影响。

Gut microbiota associations with diet in irritable bowel syndrome and the effect of low FODMAP diet and probiotics.

机构信息

King's College London, Department of Nutritional Sciences, London, United Kingdom.

Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Nutrition and Nutrigenomics Group, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Nutr. 2021 Apr;40(4):1861-1870. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diet is both a modulator of the gastrointestinal microbiota and an important therapy in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to comprehensively (i) identify diet-microbiota associations in adults with IBS consuming habitual diet; (ii) assess the impact of two nutritional interventions on the microbiota; and (iii) determine whether baseline microbiota can predict clinical response to diet or probiotic intervention.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 95 individuals with IBS participating in a previously published 4-week 2x2 factorial design randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of the low FODMAP diet (LFD) and co-administration of a probiotic. Diet was assessed at four hierarchical levels and partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to profile the microbiota.

RESULTS

There were numerous diet-microbiota associations especially at the nutrient level, including a negative association between protein and Bifidobacterium abundance (r = -0.358, p < 0.001). After correction for multiple testing, the significance for this association (q = 0.237) and all others was lost. Low FODMAP diet led to changes in abundance of major saccharolytic genera compared with sham diet, including higher Bacteroides (LFD 34.1% (15.7%) vs sham 23.3% (15.2%), q = 0.01) and lower Bifidobacterium (0.9% (1.0%) vs 2.1%, (2.5%) q = 0.029). Compared with placebo, probiotic supplementation led to higher Lactobacillus (probiotic 0.08% (0.1%) vs placebo 0.03% (0.2%), q < 0.001), and Streptococcus abundance (2.0% (2.2%) vs 0.6% (1.2%), q = 0.001). The probiotic treatment buffered the impact of the low FODMAP diet on Bifidobacterium. Baseline microbiota did not predict clinical response to either intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Although diet modifies the gut microbiota, bivariate correlation analysis may only provide a limited explanation of the complex diet interactions with individual gut bacteria in IBS. Some diet interventions modify the microbiota in IBS.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ISRCTN (http://www.isrctn.com) Registered under ISRCTN registry identifier no.ISRCTN02275221.

摘要

背景和目的

饮食既是胃肠道微生物群的调节剂,也是肠易激综合征(IBS)的重要治疗方法。我们旨在全面(i)识别习惯性饮食中患有 IBS 的成年人的饮食-微生物群关联;(ii)评估两种营养干预措施对微生物群的影响;和(iii)确定基线微生物群是否可以预测对饮食或益生菌干预的临床反应。

方法

对参加先前发表的为期 4 周的 2x2 析因设计随机对照试验的 95 名 IBS 患者的数据进行了分析,该试验研究了低 FODMAP 饮食(LFD)和益生菌联合应用的影响。饮食在四个层次上进行评估,并使用部分 16S rRNA 基因测序来描绘微生物群。

结果

有许多饮食-微生物群关联,特别是在营养水平上,包括蛋白质和双歧杆菌丰度之间的负相关(r=-0.358,p<0.001)。经过多次检验校正后,这种关联(q=0.237)和其他所有关联的意义均丧失。与假饮食相比,低 FODMAP 饮食导致主要糖解菌属的丰度发生变化,包括双歧杆菌(LFD 34.1%(15.7%)与 sham 23.3%(15.2%),q=0.01)和拟杆菌(0.9%(1.0%)与 2.1%(2.5%),q=0.029)。与安慰剂相比,益生菌补充剂导致更高的乳杆菌(益生菌 0.08%(0.1%)与安慰剂 0.03%(0.2%),q<0.001)和链球菌丰度(2.0%(2.2%)与 0.6%(1.2%),q=0.001)。益生菌治疗缓冲了低 FODMAP 饮食对双歧杆菌的影响。基线微生物群不能预测对任何干预措施的临床反应。

结论

尽管饮食可以改变肠道微生物群,但双变量相关分析可能只能提供对 IBS 中个体肠道细菌与饮食复杂相互作用的有限解释。一些饮食干预措施可以改变 IBS 中的微生物群。

试验注册

ISRCTN(http://www.isrctn.com)在 ISRCTN 注册处登记,登记号为 ISRCTN02275221。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验