Singh Prashant, Dean Gregory, Iram Sofia, Peng Westley, Chey Samuel W, Rifkin Samara, Lothen-Kline Christine, Muir Jane, Lee Allen A, Eswaran Shanti, Chey William D
Divsion of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA.
Modify Health, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Oct;37(10):e70060. doi: 10.1111/nmo.70060. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
Mediterranean diet (MD) has been proposed as a dietary therapy for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but its efficacy remains unclear. We compared the efficacy of MD to a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (LFD).
In this pilot-feasibility, randomized controlled trial (RCT), adult patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) or mixed bowel pattern (IBS-M) were randomized to MD versus LFD for 4 weeks. Meals were provided for both groups (ModifyHealth, GA). Daily variables included abdominal pain intensity (API) and bloating, while IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) and IBS adequate relief (IBS-AR) were scored weekly. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥ 30% decrease in API for ≥ 2/4 weeks.
Of 26 randomized patients, 20 finished the study (10 per group). Seventy-three percent of the MD group met the primary endpoint compared to 81.8% of the LFD group (p = 1.0). Although not statistically significant, a numerically higher proportion of the LFD group reported adequate relief and met the responder endpoint for IBS-SSS (50-point reduction) compared to the MD group (54.6% vs. 27.3% for IBS-AR and 81.8% vs. 45.5% for IBS-SSS, p = 0.39 and 0.18, respectively). The LFD group also had a significantly greater reduction in IBS-SSS score over the 4-week treatment period compared to the MD group (-105.5 vs. -60, p = 0.02).
MD provides symptom relief in IBS-D and IBS-M; however, the magnitude of relief was higher with the LFD. Larger diet comparison studies in real-world settings are needed before MD can be routinely recommended to IBS patients.
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05807919.
地中海饮食(MD)已被提议作为肠易激综合征(IBS)的一种饮食疗法,但其疗效仍不明确。我们比较了地中海饮食与低可发酵寡糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇饮食(LFD)的疗效。
在这项初步可行性随机对照试验(RCT)中,腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)或混合型肠易激综合征(IBS-M)的成年患者被随机分为地中海饮食组和低可发酵寡糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇饮食组,为期4周。两组均提供膳食(ModifyHealth,佐治亚州)。每日变量包括腹痛强度(API)和腹胀,而肠易激综合征症状严重程度评分(IBS-SSS)和肠易激综合征充分缓解(IBS-AR)每周进行评分。主要终点是在≥2/4周内腹痛强度降低≥30%的患者比例。
26名随机分组的患者中,20名完成了研究(每组10名)。地中海饮食组73%的患者达到主要终点,而低可发酵寡糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇饮食组为81.8%(p = 1.0)。虽然无统计学意义,但与地中海饮食组相比,低可发酵寡糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇饮食组报告充分缓解并达到肠易激综合征症状严重程度评分(降低50分)应答终点的比例在数值上更高(肠易激综合征充分缓解分别为54.6%对27.3%,肠易激综合征症状严重程度评分为81.8%对45.5%,p分别为0.39和0.18)。与地中海饮食组相比,低可发酵寡糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇饮食组在4周治疗期内肠易激综合征症状严重程度评分的降低也显著更大(-105.5对-60,p = 0.02)。
地中海饮食可缓解腹泻型肠易激综合征和混合型肠易激综合征的症状;然而,低可发酵寡糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇饮食的缓解程度更高。在能够常规向肠易激综合征患者推荐地中海饮食之前,需要在现实环境中进行更大规模的饮食比较研究。
Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT05807919。