• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在优先采用腹膜透析策略下,针对5期慢性肾脏病患者腹膜透析决策的定制化视频咨询与传统视频咨询:一项随机对照研究

Customized versus conventional video counseling for peritoneal dialysis decision-making in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease under a PD-first policy: a randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Parapiboon Watanyu, Pitsawong Wannapat, Wongluechai Laddaporn, Thammavaranucupt Kanin, Raegasint Lalana

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

出版信息

Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2020 Dec 31;39(4):451-459. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.20.035.

DOI:10.23876/j.krcp.20.035
PMID:33184239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7770997/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Indecision regarding the start of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a challenging problem in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients who receive conventional video counseling. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of video counseling customized to the local context versus conventional video counseling on PD decision-making in CKD stage 5 patients under PD-first policy.

METHODS

We enrolled 120 patients with stage 5 CKD in Thailand who initiate PD between May 2016 to January 2017 in a randomized, open-label, controlled study. Patients were randomized to either a customized or conventional video counseling group. The primary outcome was PD acceptance rate with complete PD catheter insertion on schedule. The secondary outcomes were change in patient knowledge and confidence in PD and reasons for indecision PD.

RESULTS

We analyzed 120 patients (customized, n = 60 vs. conventional, n = 60). The two groups were similar for age (55 vs. 56 years), blood urea nitrogen (89 vs. 86 mg/dL), creatinine (10.37 vs. 11.29 mg/dL), and eGFR (4.7 vs. 5.6 mL/min/1.73 m2). The PD acceptance rate along with PD catheter insertion on schedule in the customized video counseling group was not significantly different from that in the conventional video counseling group (66.6% vs. 63.3%, relative risk: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.29; P = 0.86). Patient knowledge of and confidence in PD increased after counseling, but the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Among stage 5 CKD patients, counseling content customized to a local context did not differ in a rate of acceptance for beginning PD with PD catheter insertion on schedule compared with conventional video counseling.

摘要

背景

对于接受传统视频咨询的慢性肾脏病(CKD)5期患者而言,腹膜透析(PD)起始时机的决策是一个具有挑战性的问题。本研究旨在评估针对当地情况定制的视频咨询与传统视频咨询对CKD 5期患者在PD优先策略下PD决策的影响。

方法

我们在泰国招募了120例于2016年5月至2017年1月开始进行PD的CKD 5期患者,进行一项随机、开放标签、对照研究。患者被随机分为定制视频咨询组或传统视频咨询组。主要结局是按时完成PD导管插入的PD接受率。次要结局是患者对PD的知识和信心的变化以及PD决策犹豫的原因。

结果

我们分析了120例患者(定制组,n = 60 vs. 传统组,n = 60)。两组在年龄(55岁 vs. 56岁)、血尿素氮(89 mg/dL vs. 86 mg/dL)、肌酐(10.37 mg/dL vs. 11.29 mg/dL)和估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)(4.7 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. 5.6 mL/min/1.73 m²)方面相似。定制视频咨询组按时进行PD导管插入的PD接受率与传统视频咨询组相比无显著差异(66.6% vs. 63.3%,相对风险:0.97,95%置信区间:0.73至1.29;P = 0.86)。咨询后患者对PD的知识和信心有所增加,但差异不显著。

结论

在CKD 5期患者中,与传统视频咨询相比,针对当地情况定制的咨询内容在按时进行PD导管插入开始PD的接受率方面没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e3/7770997/3a46d0df7ba8/KRCP-39-451-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e3/7770997/087c9ce78691/KRCP-39-451-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e3/7770997/74c1bd93b11e/KRCP-39-451-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e3/7770997/3a46d0df7ba8/KRCP-39-451-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e3/7770997/087c9ce78691/KRCP-39-451-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e3/7770997/74c1bd93b11e/KRCP-39-451-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e3/7770997/3a46d0df7ba8/KRCP-39-451-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Customized versus conventional video counseling for peritoneal dialysis decision-making in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease under a PD-first policy: a randomized controlled study.在优先采用腹膜透析策略下,针对5期慢性肾脏病患者腹膜透析决策的定制化视频咨询与传统视频咨询:一项随机对照研究
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2020 Dec 31;39(4):451-459. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.20.035.
2
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease.紧急启动腹膜透析与常规启动腹膜透析治疗慢性肾脏病患者的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 15;12(12):CD012913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012913.pub2.
3
Comparison of outcomes of urgent-start and conventional-start peritoneal dialysis: a single-centre experience.紧急启动与传统启动腹膜透析的结局比较:单中心经验
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Mar;53(3):583-590. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02630-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Placement of a Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter and Outcomes: The CAPD I Trial.比较腹膜透析导管开放置入与腹腔镜置入及结局的随机对照试验:CAPD I试验
Perit Dial Int. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):104-112. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00023. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease: a 10-year retrospective study.紧急启动腹膜透析治疗终末期肾病患者:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Jul 2;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1408-9.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Appropriate Time to Initiate Peritoneal Dialysis after Insertion of Catheter (Timely PD Study).一项确定导管插入术后开始腹膜透析的合适时间的随机对照试验(适时腹膜透析研究)。
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Jul-Aug;37(4):420-428. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00066. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Early and Late Patient Outcomes in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis.紧急开始腹膜透析的早期和晚期患者结局
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Jul-Aug;37(4):414-419. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00158. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
8
A Comparable Study on the Outcomes of Urgent Initiated Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Conventional Start, A Single Centre Study from North-East India.印度东北部单中心研究:紧急开始腹膜透析与常规开始的结局比较。
Iran J Kidney Dis. 2020 Dec;14(6):488-493.
9
A combination of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis solutions and residual renal function, peritoneal transport, and inflammation markers: a randomized clinical trial.生物相容性腹膜透析液与残余肾功能、腹膜转运及炎症标志物的联合应用:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Dec;60(6):966-75. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
10
Feasibility of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis in Older Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Single-Center Experience.老年终末期肾病患者紧急开始腹膜透析的可行性:单中心经验
Perit Dial Int. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):125-130. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00002. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The way home: a scoping review of public health interventions to increase the utilization of home dialysis in chronic kidney disease patients.回家之路:对增加慢性肾病患者家庭透析利用率的公共卫生干预措施的范围综述
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Apr 1;26(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04072-9.
2
Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review.晚期肾病中的共同决策:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e055248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055248.
3
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.决策辅导:帮助人们做出医疗决策。

本文引用的文献

1
Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.透析起始、方式选择、通路和处方:肾脏病:改善全球预后组织(KDIGO)争议会议的结论。
Kidney Int. 2019 Jul;96(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
2
What do the US advanced kidney disease patients want? Comprehensive pre-ESRD Patient Education (CPE) and choice of dialysis modality.美国晚期肾病患者想要什么?全面的终末期肾病前患者教育(CPE)和透析方式的选择。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 9;14(4):e0215091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215091. eCollection 2019.
3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013385.pub2.
4
Patient education and care for end-stage kidney disease: one size never fits all.终末期肾病患者的教育与护理:一刀切的方法行不通。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2020 Dec 31;39(4):384-386. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.20.208.
Exploring Barriers and Potential Solutions in Home Dialysis: An NKF-KDOQI Conference Outcomes Report.
探索居家透析中的障碍和潜在解决方案:NKF-KDOQI 会议成果报告。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):363-371. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
Educational Support Around Dialysis Modality Decision Making in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Qualitative Study.慢性肾脏病患者透析方式决策的教育支持:定性研究
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Oct 8;5:2054358118803323. doi: 10.1177/2054358118803323. eCollection 2018.
5
Thailand's universal coverage scheme and its impact on health-seeking behavior.泰国的全民覆盖计划及其对就医行为的影响。
Springerplus. 2016 Nov 10;5(1):1952. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3665-4. eCollection 2016.
6
Educating Patients about CKD: The Path to Self-Management and Patient-Centered Care.向患者宣传慢性肾脏病:自我管理和以患者为中心的医疗之路。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):694-703. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07680715. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
7
Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YoDDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study Across 6 Predialysis Services.约克郡透析决策辅助工具(YoDDA)手册的患者可接受性:一项对6个透析前服务机构的前瞻性非随机对照研究。
Perit Dial Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):374-81. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00274. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline.慢性肾脏病的评估与管理:肾脏病:改善全球预后 2012 临床实践指南概要。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):825-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00007.
9
Universal coverage of renal dialysis in Thailand: promise, progress, and prospects.泰国的肾脏透析全民覆盖:承诺、进展和前景。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 31;346:f462. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f462.
10
The impact of an "acute dialysis start" on the mortality attributed to the use of central venous catheters: a retrospective cohort study.急性透析开始对使用中心静脉导管导致的死亡率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2012 Jul 30;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-72.