Maccagno A, Di Giorgio E E, Caston O L, Sagasta C L
Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Francés, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Am J Med. 1987 Nov 20;83(5A):72-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90855-2.
A double-blind, randomized, 84-day controlled clinical trial was carried out to compare orally administered S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) (1,200 mg per day) with oral piroxicam therapy (20 mg per day) in the management of unilateral knee osteoarthritis. The ability of each drug to maintain the results achieved at the end of the treatment period was also evaluated during a 56-day follow-up period. Forty-five patients completed the study, 22 in the SAMe group and 23 in the piroxicam group. Both SAMe and piroxicam proved effective in inducing a significant improvement in the total pain score after 28 days of treatment. With regard to the other clinical parameters (i.e., morning stiffness, the distance walked before the onset of pain, active and passive motility), improvement started from about Day 56 in both groups. No significant difference was found between the two treatments in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Patients treated with SAMe maintained clinical improvement achieved at the end of treatment longer than did patients receiving piroxicam.
开展了一项双盲、随机、为期84天的对照临床试验,以比较口服S-腺苷甲硫氨酸(SAMe)(每日1200毫克)与口服吡罗昔康疗法(每日20毫克)对单侧膝关节骨关节炎的治疗效果。在为期56天的随访期内,还评估了每种药物维持治疗期末所取得疗效的能力。45名患者完成了研究,SAMe组22名,吡罗昔康组23名。治疗28天后,SAMe和吡罗昔康均被证明能有效显著改善总疼痛评分。关于其他临床参数(即晨僵、疼痛发作前行走距离、主动和被动活动度),两组均从约第56天开始改善。两种治疗在疗效和耐受性方面未发现显著差异。接受SAMe治疗的患者在治疗结束后维持临床改善的时间比接受吡罗昔康治疗的患者更长。