University of Notre Dame.
University College Dublin, Queen's University Belfast.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Dec;85(4):7-123. doi: 10.1111/mono.12423.
Growing up in the aftermath of armed conflict puts youth at a higher risk for psychopathology-particularly in societies like Northern Ireland which continue to be characterized by intergroup tension and cyclical violence. This risk may be heightened during adolescence, when youth are beginning to explore their identities and are becoming more aware of intergroup dynamics in both their immediate communities and the broader society. It is also during this stage when youth increasingly witness or engage in antisocial behavior and sectarian activities. A series of studies in Belfast conducted by Cummings et al. (2014, Child Dev Perspect, 12(1), 16-38; 2019, J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 48(2), 296-305) showed that adolescents' exposure to sectarian violence resulted in heightened emotional insecurity about the community and subsequent adjustment problems. Though the impact of direct exposure to violence is well documented, few studies have accounted for the influence of sectarianism that occurs outside of one's immediate environment. These influences may include the general climate surrounding events that are not experienced firsthand but are nonetheless salient, such as the overarching levels of tension between groups or societal discourse that is threatening to one's identity. These higher-level influences, often referred to collectively as the macrosystem, are a necessary component to consider for adequately assessing one's socio-developmental environment. Yet, measurement at this level of the social ecology has proven elusive in past work. The current study advances research in this area by using newspaper coding as a method of measuring the political macrosystem in Northern Ireland and assessing whether a tense or threatening climate serves as an added risk factor for youth living in Belfast. In the current study, we measured sectarian violence at the level of the macrosystem by systematically collecting and coding newspaper articles from Northern Ireland that were published between 2006 and 2011 (N = 2,797). Each article was coded according to its level of overall political tension between Catholics and Protestants, threat to Catholics, and threat to Protestants. When aggregated, these assessments reflected the overarching trends in Catholic-Protestant relations during this period. In order to assess the association between these sociopolitical trends and the direct experiences of adolescents, the newspaper coding was linked with five waves of survey data from families (N = 999) in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of Belfast. Using a series of multilevel moderation analyses, we then tested whether intergroup tension and ingroup threat moderated the relation between adolescents' direct exposure to violence and their emotional insecurity. These analyses were followed by a thematic analysis of the coded newspaper articles in order to provide further context to the findings. The results indicated that adolescents' response to direct exposure to sectarian violence varied based on the political climate at the time of their interview. Overall, the adolescents' emotional insecurity about the community increased with exposure to sectarian violence. During periods when the sociopolitical climate was characterized by high levels of intergroup political tension, this relation was slightly weaker-regardless of the adolescents' ingroup (i.e., Protestant vs. Catholic). During periods when the sociopolitical climate was coded as threatening, this relation was weaker for Catholic adolescents. That is, high levels of macro-level threat-particularly events coded as threatening for Protestants-seemed to be a protective factor for Catholic adolescents. Group differences were also found based on the adolescents' cumulative amount of exposure to sectarian violence. As threat in the macrosystem increased, Catholic adolescents who were directly exposed to higher than average levels of sectarian violence became more emotionally secure, while Catholics with little to no exposure to violence became more insecure. Contrastingly, Protestant adolescents directly exposed to higher than average levels of sectarian violence were more insecure than Protestants with little to no violence exposure. A thematic analysis of the newspaper articles revealed the categories of events that were viewed by coders as politically tense and threatening. Five primary themes emerged: ineffective policing and justice, family and community unrest, memories of violence, destabilized leadership, and organized paramilitary activity. Many of the articles coded as most threatening reported on a spike in attacks organized by dissident republican groups-that is, members of the Catholic community with, particularly hardline views. This may be pertinent to the finding that associations between sectarian violence exposure and emotional insecurity were exacerbated during this time for Protestants but not for Catholics. Findings from the thematic analysis provide a deeper examination of the context of events taking place during the study period, as well as their potential bearing on interpretation of the macro-level effects. In conclusion, these findings illustrate how one's response to the immediate environment can vary based on shifts in the political macrosystem. The current study thus contributes conceptually, empirically, and methodologically to the understanding of process relations between multiple levels of the social ecology and adolescent functioning. These results may further inform the design of future interventions and policies meant to lessen the impact of political violence. The methods used here may also be useful for the study of other contexts in which macrosystem effects are likely to have a salient impact on individual wellbeing.
在武装冲突后成长的青年更容易出现精神病理学问题——尤其是在北爱尔兰这样的社会,这些社会仍然以群体间紧张和周期性暴力为特征。这种风险在青春期可能会更高,因为此时青年开始探索自己的身份,并更加意识到自己所在的直接社区和更广泛的社会中的群体动态。也正是在这个阶段,青年越来越多地目睹或参与反社会行为和宗派活动。 Cummings 等人在贝尔法斯特进行的一系列研究(2014 年,儿童发展展望,12(1),16-38;2019 年,临床儿童与青少年心理学杂志,48(2),296-305)表明,青少年接触宗派暴力会导致他们对社区产生更强烈的情感不安全感,并随后出现适应问题。虽然直接接触暴力的影响已有充分记录,但很少有研究考虑到发生在自己直接环境之外的宗派主义的影响。这些影响可能包括围绕着人们没有亲身经历但却非常突出的事件的一般氛围,例如群体之间的总体紧张程度或对自己身份构成威胁的社会话语。这些更高层次的影响,通常被统称为宏系统,是充分评估一个人社会发展环境所必需的组成部分。然而,在过去的工作中,这一社会生态学层次的测量一直难以实现。本研究通过使用报纸编码作为测量北爱尔兰政治宏系统的一种方法,并评估紧张或威胁性的氛围是否对居住在贝尔法斯特的青年构成额外风险因素,从而推进了这一领域的研究。在当前的研究中,我们通过系统地收集和编码 2006 年至 2011 年期间在北爱尔兰出版的报纸文章(N=2797),在宏系统层面上衡量宗派暴力。每篇文章都根据天主教徒和新教徒之间的总体政治紧张程度、对天主教徒的威胁以及对新教徒的威胁进行了编码。当汇总时,这些评估反映了这一时期天主教徒-新教徒关系的总体趋势。为了评估这些社会政治趋势与青少年直接经历之间的关联,将报纸编码与来自贝尔法斯特社会经济弱势地区的家庭(N=999)的五波调查数据联系起来。然后,我们使用一系列多层次的调节分析来测试青少年直接接触暴力与他们的情感不安全感之间的关系是否受到群体间紧张和群体内威胁的调节。随后,对编码的报纸文章进行了主题分析,以便为研究结果提供进一步的背景信息。研究结果表明,青少年对直接接触宗派暴力的反应取决于他们接受采访时的政治氛围。总的来说,青少年对社区的情感不安全感随着宗派暴力的增加而增加。在群体间政治紧张程度高的时期,这种关系稍弱——无论青少年的群体内身份(即新教徒与天主教徒)如何。在社会政治气候被编码为威胁的时期,这种关系对天主教徒较弱。也就是说,高水平的宏观威胁——尤其是对新教徒构成威胁的事件——似乎对天主教徒是一种保护因素。根据青少年接触宗派暴力的累积量,也发现了群体差异。随着宏系统威胁的增加,直接接触高于平均水平宗派暴力的天主教徒变得更加有安全感,而几乎没有接触过暴力的天主教徒则变得更加没有安全感。相反,直接接触高于平均水平宗派暴力的新教徒比几乎没有接触过暴力的新教徒更没有安全感。对报纸文章的主题分析揭示了被编码员视为政治紧张和威胁的事件类别。出现了五个主要主题:执法不力和司法不公、家庭和社区动荡、暴力记忆、领导地位不稳定和有组织的准军事活动。许多被编码为最具威胁性的文章报道了由持不同政见的共和派组织(即对天主教社区持有强硬观点的成员)发起的一波袭击。这可能与以下发现有关:在这段时间里,新教徒与宗派暴力接触的关联和情感不安全感加剧,但天主教徒则没有。主题分析提供了对研究期间发生的事件背景的更深入检查,以及它们对解释宏观层面影响的潜在影响。总之,这些发现说明了一个人对直接环境的反应如何根据政治宏系统的变化而变化。因此,本研究从概念、经验和方法上为理解社会生态学多个层次与青少年功能之间的过程关系做出了贡献。这些结果可能会进一步为设计旨在减轻政治暴力影响的未来干预措施和政策提供信息。这里使用的方法也可能对其他可能对个人幸福产生重大影响的宏观系统效应的背景有用。