Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Dec;38(4):411-420. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1843939. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
To explore GPs' perspectives on and daily experiences with the relational potential of email consultations.
Qualitative study with data from participant observation and semi-structured interviews.
General practice setting in Denmark.
Practice personnel from four clinics were observed and 16 GPs (seven women and nine men, between 35 and 70 years of age) interviewed. Field notes and interview data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.
Main themes and subthemes reporting GPs' perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultations.
The analyses showed that due to perceived interpretational shortcomings, the GPs generally experienced email consultation as unsuitable for communication about relational, socio-emotional and sensitive matters. In doctor-patient relationships founded on mutual knowledge and trust, the email consultation was however used as a supportive communication channel, as a way for the patient to express emotions and affect and for the GP to proactively show interest and compassion towards the patient.
Email consultations were highly context-variant. Within continuing relationships and in conjunction with face-to-face consultations, email consultation was used for supportive communication holding the potential for maintaining, strengthening and/or dissolving the GP-patient relationship. Therefore, email consultation is not simply an information-delivery tool but also holds more explicit relational potentials. KEY POINTS Overall, the GPs perceived email consultation as unsuitable for non-medical, relationship-oriented purposes. Nonetheless, the GPs experienced that email consultations oftentimes comprised communication about relational and socio-emotional issues. Knowledge of the patient was a vital factor for the GP's comfort in and acceptability of relational functions of email consultation. Email consultation is not simply an information-delivery tool as it holds the potential for maintaining, strengthening and/or dissolving the GP-patient relationship.
探讨全科医生对电子邮件咨询的关系潜力的看法和日常体验。
参与者观察和半结构化访谈的定性研究。
丹麦的全科医疗诊所。
从四个诊所观察到的实践人员和 16 名全科医生(7 名女性和 9 名男性,年龄在 35 至 70 岁之间)进行了访谈。使用归纳主题分析方法对现场记录和访谈数据进行分析。
报告全科医生对电子邮件咨询的关系潜力的看法和经验的主要主题和子主题。
分析表明,由于感知到解释上的不足,全科医生普遍认为电子邮件咨询不适合交流关系、社会情感和敏感问题。在基于相互了解和信任的医患关系中,电子邮件咨询被用作支持性的沟通渠道,是患者表达情感和影响以及医生主动对患者表示兴趣和同情的方式。
电子邮件咨询高度依赖于背景。在持续的关系中,并与面对面咨询相结合,电子邮件咨询用于支持性沟通,具有维持、加强和/或解散医患关系的潜力。因此,电子邮件咨询不仅仅是一种信息传递工具,还具有更明确的关系潜力。要点:全科医生普遍认为电子邮件咨询不适合用于非医疗、关系导向的目的。然而,全科医生体验到电子邮件咨询通常包含有关关系和社会情感问题的沟通。对患者的了解是全科医生对电子邮件咨询的关系功能感到舒适和可接受的一个重要因素。电子邮件咨询不仅仅是一种信息传递工具,因为它具有维持、加强和/或解散医患关系的潜力。