• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术中的认知训练:优化手术培训的机会?一项试点研究。

Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Department of Urology, Asclepius Clinic Wandsbek, Alphonsstrasse 14, 22043, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):761-767. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01167-3. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-020-01167-3
PMID:33185847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8423692/
Abstract

The rapid rise of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has necessitated an efficient and standardized training curriculum. Cognitive training (CT) can significantly improve skills, such as attention, working memory and problem solving, and can enhance surgical capacity and support RAS training. This pilot study was carried out between 02/2019 and 04/2019. The participants included 33 student volunteers, randomized into 3 groups: group 1 received training using the da Vinci training simulator, group 2 received computer-based cognitive training, and group 3 was the control group without training. Before (T1) and after-training (T2), performance was measured. Additionally, expert ratings and self-evaluations were collected. Subjective evaluations of performance were supplemented by evaluations based on three scales from the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). In total, 25 probands remained with complete data for further analyses: n = 8 (group 1), n = 7 (group 2) and n = 10 (group 3). There were no significant differences in T1 and T2 among all three groups. The average training gain of group 1 and 2 was 15.87% and 24.6%, respectively, (a restricting condition is the loss of the last training session in group 2). Analyses of semi-structured psychological interviews (SPIs) revealed no significant differences for T1, but in T2, significance occurred at 'self-reflection' for group 2 (F(2.22) = 8.56; p < .005). The efficacy of CT in training highly complex and difficult procedures, such as RAS, is a proven and accepted fact. Further investigation involving higher numbers of training trials (while also being cost effective) should be performed.

摘要

机器人辅助手术(RAS)的迅速发展需要一个高效和标准化的培训课程。认知训练(CT)可以显著提高技能,如注意力、工作记忆和解决问题的能力,并可以增强手术能力和支持 RAS 培训。这项试点研究于 2019 年 2 月至 4 月进行。参与者包括 33 名学生志愿者,随机分为 3 组:第 1 组使用达芬奇手术模拟器进行培训,第 2 组接受计算机认知训练,第 3 组为无培训对照组。在培训前后(T1 和 T2)测量表现。此外,还收集了专家评分和自我评估。通过修订后的 NEO 人格量表(NEO PI-R)的三个量表对主观表现评估进行了补充。共有 25 名被试者的数据完整,可进一步分析:n = 8(第 1 组)、n = 7(第 2 组)和 n = 10(第 3 组)。三组在 T1 和 T2 之间没有显著差异。第 1 组和第 2 组的平均培训增益分别为 15.87%和 24.6%(限制条件是第 2 组失去最后一次培训课程)。对半结构化心理访谈(SPI)的分析显示,T1 时没有显著差异,但在 T2 时,第 2 组的“自我反思”出现了显著差异(F(2.22)=8.56;p<.005)。在培训高度复杂和困难的程序,如 RAS 方面,CT 的功效是经过验证和接受的事实。应进行涉及更多培训试验(同时具有成本效益)的进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35c/8423692/f0a6bab93172/11701_2020_1167_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35c/8423692/fe43eda6150f/11701_2020_1167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35c/8423692/d5a947a8415f/11701_2020_1167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35c/8423692/f0a6bab93172/11701_2020_1167_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35c/8423692/fe43eda6150f/11701_2020_1167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35c/8423692/d5a947a8415f/11701_2020_1167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35c/8423692/f0a6bab93172/11701_2020_1167_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive training for robotic surgery: a chance to optimize surgical training? A pilot study.机器人手术中的认知训练:优化手术培训的机会?一项试点研究。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):761-767. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01167-3. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
2
Structured training on the da Vinci Skills Simulator leads to improvement in technical performance of robotic novices.在达芬奇技能模拟器上进行结构化培训可提高机器人新手的技术表现。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Feb;42(1):71-80. doi: 10.1111/coa.12666. Epub 2016 May 15.
3
An Efficient Single-session Spatial Skill Trainer for Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Trial.一种用于机器人辅助手术的高效单次疗程空间技能训练器:一项随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):728-737.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 27.
4
Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum.欧洲泌尿外科学会机器人培训课程的初步验证研究。
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):292-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
5
A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.基础虚拟现实技能的机器人模拟性能比较:模拟器主观与客观评估工具
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
The effect of different training exercises on the performance outcome on the da Vinci Skills Simulator.不同训练练习对达芬奇技能模拟器性能结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2397-2405. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5240-z. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
7
Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?机器人手术模拟器性能与手术技能相关吗?
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):1052-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Comparison of Training Efficacy Between Custom-Made Skills Simulator (CMSS) and da Vinci Skills Simulators: A Randomized Control Study.定制技能模拟器(CMSS)与达芬奇技能模拟器训练效果比较:一项随机对照研究。
World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2699-2709. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05108-6.
9
Design and Evaluation of a Performance-based Adaptive Curriculum for Robotic Surgical Training: a Pilot Study.基于性能的机器人手术训练自适应课程的设计与评估:一项初步研究。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:2162-2165. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512728.
10
Evaluating Non-operative Robotic Skills in Colorectal Surgical Training.评估结直肠手术培训中的非手术机器人技能。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Role of Cognitive Capacity and Adaptive Learning in Professional Education: A Scoping Review.探索认知能力和适应性学习在专业教育中的作用:一项范围综述。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Jan 10;35(2):1123-1136. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02271-x. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Cognitive ergonomics and robotic surgery.认知工效学与机器人手术。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 5;18(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01852-7.
3
"Role-sharing surgery": a new surgical education system that gives beginner surgeons more chances to operate while ensuring the surgical quality of robotic surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education.机器人手术课程和培训的全面回顾:面向住院医师、研究员和研究生外科教育。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):361-367. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06775-1. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Surgical Skills Improvement Using a Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Ventral Incisional Hernia.使用低成本腹腔镜模拟器改善腹直肌切口疝的手术技能
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Oct 12;31:25-30.
3
'The other right': control strategies and the role of language use in laparoscopic training.
“角色共享手术”:一种新的外科教育系统,让初级外科医生有更多机会进行手术,同时确保机器人手术的手术质量。
Surg Today. 2024 Mar;54(3):282-287. doi: 10.1007/s00595-023-02749-y. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
Med Educ. 2017 Dec;51(12):1269-1276. doi: 10.1111/medu.13420. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Comparison of 2 training programs for basic laparoscopic skills and simulated surgery performance in veterinary students.两种针对兽医学生基本腹腔镜技能和模拟手术操作的培训方案比较。
Vet Surg. 2017 Nov;46(8):1187-1197. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12729. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
5
Instituting a Surgical Skills Competition Increases Technical Performance of Surgical Clerkship Students Over Time.开展外科技能竞赛可随着时间的推移提高外科技能实习学生的技术表现。
J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Toward a Model of Human Information Processing for Decision-Making and Skill Acquisition in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.面向腹腔镜结直肠手术决策和技能获取的人类信息处理模型。
J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):749-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Safety considerations in learning new procedures: a survey of surgeons.学习新手术操作的安全考量:外科医生调查
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.058. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
8
Surgical resident technical skill self-evaluation: increased precision with training progression.外科住院医师技术技能自我评估:随着培训进程精度提高。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.070.
9
Measuring Surgical Skills in Simulation-based Training.在基于模拟的训练中测量手术技能
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Oct;25(10):665-672. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00253.
10
Mental training in surgical education: a systematic review.外科教育中的心理训练:一项系统综述。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Nov;87(11):873-878. doi: 10.1111/ans.14140. Epub 2017 Aug 29.