Department of Pediatrics, Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 13;15(11):e0242311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242311. eCollection 2020.
Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) in children comprises multiple risk factors that should not be evaluated separately due to collinearity and multiple cause and effect relationships. This is one of the first case-control study of pediatric HA-VTE risk factors using a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) analysis.
Retrospective, case-control study with 22 cases of objectively confirmed HA-VTE and 76 controls matched by age, sex, unit of admission, and period of hospitalization. Descriptive statistics were used to define distributions of continuous variables, frequencies, and proportions of categorical variables, comparing cases and controls. Due to many potential risk factors of HA-VTE, a directed acyclic graph (DAG) model was created to identify confounding, reduce bias, and increase precision on the analysis. The final model consisted of a DAG-informed conditional logistic regression.
In the initial conventional univariable model, the following variables were selected as potential risk factors for HA-VTE: length of stay (LOS, days), immobility, ICU admission in the last 30 days, LOS in ICU, infection, central venous catheter (CVC), number of CVCs placed, L-asparaginase, heart failure, liver failure, and nephrotic syndrome. The final model using the set of variables selected by DAG analysis revealed LOS (OR = 1.106, 95%CI = 1.021-1.198, p = 0.013), L-asparaginase (OR = 26.463, 95%CI = 1.609-435.342, p = 0.022), and nephrotic syndrome (OR = 29.127, 95%CI = 1.044-812.508, p = 0.004) as independent risk factors for HA-VTE.
The DAG-based approach was useful to clarify the influence of confounders and multiple causalities of HA-VTE. Interestingly, CVC placement-a known thrombotic risk factor highlighted in several studies-was considered a confounder, while LOS, L-asparaginase use and nephrotic syndrome were confirmed as risk factors to HA-VTE. Large confidence intervals are related to the sample size; however, the results were significant.
儿童医院获得性静脉血栓栓塞症(HA-VTE)包含多个风险因素,由于这些因素之间存在共线性和多重因果关系,因此不应单独评估。这是使用有向无环图(DAG)分析对儿科 HA-VTE 风险因素进行的首例病例对照研究之一。
这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入 22 例经客观证实的 HA-VTE 患儿病例和 76 例年龄、性别、入院科室和住院时间相匹配的对照。采用描述性统计方法比较病例和对照,定义连续变量的分布、分类变量的频率和比例。由于 HA-VTE 存在许多潜在的风险因素,因此构建了有向无环图(DAG)模型以识别混杂因素、减少偏差并提高分析的精度。最终模型由 DAG 指导的条件逻辑回归组成。
在初始的传统单变量模型中,以下变量被选为 HA-VTE 的潜在风险因素:住院时间(LOS,天)、活动受限、入院前 30 天入住 ICU、入住 ICU 时间、感染、中心静脉导管(CVC)、放置的 CVC 数量、L-天冬酰胺酶、心力衰竭、肝衰竭和肾病综合征。使用 DAG 分析选择的变量集构建的最终模型显示,LOS(比值比[OR] = 1.106,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.021-1.198,p = 0.013)、L-天冬酰胺酶(OR = 26.463,95%CI = 1.609-435.342,p = 0.022)和肾病综合征(OR = 29.127,95%CI = 1.044-812.508,p = 0.004)是 HA-VTE 的独立危险因素。
基于 DAG 的方法有助于阐明 HA-VTE 的混杂因素和多重因果关系的影响。有趣的是,CVC 置管是一项已知的血栓形成危险因素,在多项研究中均有强调,但在本研究中被认为是混杂因素,而 LOS、L-天冬酰胺酶的使用和肾病综合征则被确认为 HA-VTE 的危险因素。置信区间较大与样本量有关,但结果具有统计学意义。