Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 11;17(22):8326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228326.
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability and one of the most common reasons for physician visits in primary care, with a 33% rate of recurrence during the first year. However, the most optimal exercise program in this context remains unknown. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based progressive strength training program in non-specific chronic LBP (CLBP) patients in primary care on pain recurrence and physical function. Eighty-five patients with non-specific CLBP were separated into two groups (Intervention group: completed a progressive strength training program 3 days per week for 8 weeks; Control group: received the usual care). The intervention group showed a recurrence rate of 8.3%, while the control group had a recurrence rate of 33.3% and a shorter time until the first recurrent episode. The intervention group showed increased lumbar extensor strength, left-hand handgrip strength, and reduced the number of pain sites compared with the control group. Results also showed greater odds for reducing LBP intensity and disability in the intervention group. In conclusion, a group-based progressive strength training program is a more effective and efficient alternative than Back-School programs and can easily be carried out in the primary health care context.
下背痛(LBP)是导致残疾的主要原因之一,也是初级保健中医生就诊最常见的原因之一,第一年的复发率为 33%。然而,在这种情况下,最理想的运动方案仍然未知。本研究旨在评估基于小组的渐进式力量训练方案对初级保健中非特异性慢性下背痛(CLBP)患者疼痛复发和身体功能的有效性。85 名非特异性 CLBP 患者被分为两组(干预组:每周完成 3 天渐进式力量训练方案,持续 8 周;对照组:接受常规护理)。干预组的复发率为 8.3%,而对照组的复发率为 33.3%,且首次复发的时间更短。与对照组相比,干预组的腰椎伸肌力量、左手握力增加,疼痛部位减少。结果还显示,干预组在减轻下背痛强度和残疾方面的几率更大。总之,基于小组的渐进式力量训练方案比 Back-School 方案更有效、更高效,并且可以很容易地在初级卫生保健环境中实施。