Suppr超能文献

额-额与颞-顶单侧电休克治疗的比较。

Comparison of fronto-frontal and temporo-parietal unilateral ECT.

作者信息

D'Elia G, Frederiksen S O, Raotma H, Widepalm K

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1977 Sep;56(3):233-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1977.tb03566.x.

Abstract

An intraindividual double-blind cross-over comparison for the anterograde effect on memory of unilateral non-dominant frontofrontal (FF) and temporo-parietal (TP) ECT was performed in connection with the second and third treatment of an ECT-series, the electrode placement being alternated at random. Treatment technique was standardized and seizure duration was measured by means of EEG. Memory functions were tested after treatments by means of four memory tests: the 30 Word-Pair Test, the 30 Figure Test, the 30 Geometrical Figure Test and the 30 Face Test. Three operationally defined memory variables, immediate memory (IMS, 3 hours after ECT), delayed memory (DMS, 3 hours after IMS), and their difference, forgetting, were scored. No differences were found in the mean time of electrical stimulation, in the amount of methohexital and suxamethonium chloride, and in seizure duration between the two treatment groups. No statistically significant differences in any of the memory tests were found. The FF electrode position did not show any advantage compared with the routine TP electrode placement.

摘要

在一个ECT疗程的第二次和第三次治疗中,进行了一项个体内双盲交叉比较,以研究单侧非优势额-额(FF)和颞-顶(TP)ECT对记忆的顺行性影响,电极位置随机交替。治疗技术标准化,通过脑电图测量癫痫发作持续时间。治疗后通过四项记忆测试对记忆功能进行测试:30词对测试、30图形测试、30几何图形测试和30面部测试。对三个根据操作定义的记忆变量进行评分,即即时记忆(IMS,ECT后3小时)、延迟记忆(DMS,IMS后3小时)及其差值遗忘。两个治疗组在电刺激平均时间、甲氧己巴比妥和氯化琥珀胆碱用量以及癫痫发作持续时间方面均未发现差异。在任何记忆测试中均未发现统计学上的显著差异。与常规TP电极放置相比,FF电极位置未显示出任何优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验