Suppr超能文献

单侧优势与非优势电休克治疗对言语和非言语记忆的比较。

Comparison of unilateral dominant and non-dominant ECT on verbal and non-verbal memory.

作者信息

d'Elia G, Lorentzson S, Raotma H, Widepalm K

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1976 Feb;53(2):85-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1976.tb00063.x.

Abstract

An intraindividual, double-blind cross-over comparison of the effects of dominant (D) and non-dominant (ND) temporo-parietal unilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was performed in connection with the second and third treatment, the type of electrode placement being allocated at random. Four memory tests were used. The 30 Word-Pair Test is an audio-visual verbal recall test, the 30 Figure Test is a mainly visual recognition test with easily verbalized items. The 30 Geometrical Figure Test and the 30 Face Test are nonverbal recognition tests of visual complex and unfamiliar material. Compared with dominant ECT, non-dominant ECT has a more negative influence in the complex non-verbal visual tests, whereas dominant ECT has a more negative effect on verbal memory. In the non-verbal tests, as compared with the verbal ones, the encoding (or learning) is relatively more influenced and the retention (or storage) relatively less. An impairment either of complex apperceptive function or of memory may be responsible for the relatively lower performance in non-verbal tests after non-dominant ECT.

摘要

在第二次和第三次治疗期间,进行了一项个体内双盲交叉比较,研究优势侧(D)和非优势侧(ND)颞顶叶单侧电休克治疗(ECT)的效果,电极放置类型随机分配。使用了四项记忆测试。30词对测试是一项视听言语回忆测试,30图形测试是一项主要针对视觉识别的测试,其项目易于用言语表达。30几何图形测试和30面部测试是对视觉复杂且不熟悉材料的非言语识别测试。与优势侧ECT相比,非优势侧ECT在复杂非言语视觉测试中有更消极的影响,而优势侧ECT对言语记忆有更消极的作用。在非言语测试中,与言语测试相比,编码(或学习)受到的影响相对更大,而保持(或存储)受到的影响相对更小。非优势侧ECT后非言语测试表现相对较低可能是由于复杂感知功能或记忆受损所致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验