Br Dent J. 2020 Nov;229(9):626. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2338-4.
Author's correction note: Education article Br Dent J 2020; 228: 782-790.When initially published there were errors in the Results and Discussion section.In the Results section, 'FigurWhile 47.6% of respondents felt that the SJT was beneficial to the application and ranking process, only 9.3% felt that it was fair, representable and realistic of real-life situations' should have read 'While 47.6% of respondents felt that the SJT...
教育文章《英国牙科杂志》2020年;228卷:782 - 790页。最初发表时,结果与讨论部分存在错误。在结果部分,“虽然47.6%的受访者认为情景判断测试对申请和排名过程有益,但只有9.3%的受访者认为它公平、具有代表性且能反映现实生活情况”应改为“虽然47.6%的受访者认为情景判断测试……”