• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项经济评估研究了为糖尿病足溃疡患者持续扩散氧气疗法的成本效益。

An economic evaluation examining the cost-effectiveness of continuous diffusion of oxygen therapy for individuals with diabetic foot ulcers.

机构信息

KITE - Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2020 Dec;17(6):1791-1808. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13468. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.13468
PMID:33189100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7754389/
Abstract

Continuous delivery of oxygen therapy has been observed to improve healing for individuals with an advanced diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). However, this intervention requires the purchasing of an oxygen delivery device and moist dressings. It is unknown whether this upfront financial investment represents good value for money. Thus the aim of this project is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating advanced DFU using continuous delivery of oxygen compared with negative pressure wound therapy from the perspective of the public health care payer in Ontario, Canada. A microsimulation model was constructed with inputs from peer-reviewed journal publications and publicly available reports. The 5-year costs and quality-adjusted life-years were compared between treatment and comparator. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of results. The model predicted that continuous delivery of oxygen would cost $4800 less compared with negative pressure wound therapy and increased quality-adjusted life years by 0.025. Lower cost and improved outcomes were observed in most scenario analyses. The results of this economic evaluation suggest that CDO therapy may reduce health care economic burden with a modest increase in quality of life outcomes. Health care decision-makers should consider the inclusion of CDO for the treatment of DFU.

摘要

持续供氧治疗已被观察到可改善晚期糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者的愈合情况。然而,这种干预措施需要购买供氧设备和湿性敷料。目前尚不清楚这种前期的财务投资是否物有所值。因此,本项目旨在从加拿大安大略省公共医疗保健支付者的角度评估使用持续供氧治疗晚期 DFU 的成本效益,与负压伤口治疗进行比较。该模型使用同行评议的期刊出版物和公开报告中的数据进行构建。比较了治疗组和对照组之间 5 年的成本和调整后质量生命年。进行了敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。该模型预测,与负压伤口治疗相比,持续供氧治疗的成本将降低 4800 加元,并且调整后质量生命年将增加 0.025。在大多数方案分析中,均观察到较低的成本和改善的结果。这项经济评估的结果表明,CDO 治疗可能会降低医疗保健的经济负担,同时适度提高生活质量。医疗保健决策者应考虑将 CDO 纳入 DFU 的治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/7949353/e26793795be3/IWJ-17-1791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/7949353/23a3d779fb64/IWJ-17-1791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/7949353/7ed3860159ec/IWJ-17-1791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/7949353/e26793795be3/IWJ-17-1791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/7949353/23a3d779fb64/IWJ-17-1791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/7949353/7ed3860159ec/IWJ-17-1791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/7949353/e26793795be3/IWJ-17-1791-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
An economic evaluation examining the cost-effectiveness of continuous diffusion of oxygen therapy for individuals with diabetic foot ulcers.一项经济评估研究了为糖尿病足溃疡患者持续扩散氧气疗法的成本效益。
Int Wound J. 2020 Dec;17(6):1791-1808. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13468. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Skin Substitutes for Adults With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.成人糖尿病足溃疡和静脉性腿部溃疡用皮肤替代品:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Jun 4;21(7):1-165. eCollection 2021.
3
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.高压氧疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 May 12;17(5):1-142. eCollection 2017.
4
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Single-use and Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Treat Chronic Venous and Diabetic Foot Ulcers.比较一次性使用和传统负压伤口疗法治疗慢性静脉和糖尿病足溃疡的成本效益分析。
Wound Manag Prev. 2020 Mar;66(3):30-36.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Novel Macrophage-Regulating Treatment for Wound Healing in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers From the Taiwan Health Care Sector Perspective.从台湾医疗保健角度看新型巨噬细胞调节疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡的成本效益
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50639.
6
A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Trial Comparing Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Delivery to Moist Wound Therapy for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.一项比较经皮持续输氧与湿性伤口疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡的前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照试验。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Apr;63(4):12-28.
7
Continuous diffusion of oxygen improves diabetic foot ulcer healing when compared with a placebo control: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study.与安慰剂对照相比,持续氧扩散可改善糖尿病足溃疡愈合:一项随机、双盲、多中心研究。
J Wound Care. 2018 Sep 1;27(Sup9):S30-S45. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.Sup9.S30.
8
Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France.法国 TLC-NOSF 敷料与中性敷料治疗糖尿病足溃疡的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245652. eCollection 2021.
9
An evidence-based model comparing the cost-effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma gel to alternative therapies for patients with nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers.一种基于证据的模型,用于比较富血小板血浆凝胶与其他疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡不愈合患者的成本效益。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Dec;21(12):568-75. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000323589.27605.71.
10
Multiple Interventions for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Treatment Trial (MIDFUT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.多干预措施治疗糖尿病足溃疡试验(MIDFUT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 19;10(4):e035947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035947.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative assessment of healthy tissue oxygenation using near-infrared imaging, transcutaneous oxygen measurement, and plethysmography.使用近红外成像、经皮氧测量和体积描记法对健康组织氧合进行的比较评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15767-2.
2
Novel Treatments for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Narrative Review.糖尿病足骨髓炎的新型治疗方法:一项叙述性综述。
Microorganisms. 2025 Jul 11;13(7):1639. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13071639.
3
Effects of different treatment measures on the efficacy of diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Five year mortality and direct costs of care for people with diabetic foot complications are comparable to cancer.糖尿病足并发症患者的 5 年死亡率和医疗费用直接堪比癌症。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Mar 24;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2.
2
Global Disability Burdens of Diabetes-Related Lower-Extremity Complications in 1990 and 2016.全球 1990 年和 2016 年与糖尿病相关的下肢并发症所致残疾负担
Diabetes Care. 2020 May;43(5):964-974. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1614. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
Does Debridement Improve Clinical Outcomes in People With Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated With Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen?
不同治疗措施对糖尿病足溃疡疗效的影响:网状 Meta 分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 23;15:1452192. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1452192. eCollection 2024.
4
The Impact of Underlying Conditions on Quality-of-Life Measurement Among Patients with Chronic Wounds, as Measured by Utility Values: A Review with an Additional Study.基础条件对慢性伤口患者生命质量测量的影响:基于效用值的评估——一项综述及补充研究。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2023 Dec;12(12):680-695. doi: 10.1089/wound.2023.0098. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
清创术能否改善接受持续氧扩散治疗的糖尿病足溃疡患者的临床结局?
Wounds. 2019 Oct;31(10):246-251. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.负压伤口治疗在糖尿病患者足部伤口治疗中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 17;10(10):CD010318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3.
5
Continuous diffusion of oxygen improves diabetic foot ulcer healing when compared with a placebo control: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study.与安慰剂对照相比,持续氧扩散可改善糖尿病足溃疡愈合:一项随机、双盲、多中心研究。
J Wound Care. 2018 Sep 1;27(Sup9):S30-S45. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.Sup9.S30.
6
All-cause mortality among diabetic foot patients and related risk factors in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯糖尿病足患者的全因死亡率及相关危险因素
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188097. eCollection 2017.
7
Prognosis of the infected diabetic foot ulcer: a 12-month prospective observational study.感染性糖尿病足溃疡的预后:一项 12 个月的前瞻性观察研究。
Diabet Med. 2018 Jan;35(1):78-88. doi: 10.1111/dme.13537. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence.糖尿病足溃疡及其复发
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2367-2375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439.
9
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.高压氧疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 May 12;17(5):1-142. eCollection 2017.
10
Cost-effective Alternative for Negative-pressure Wound Therapy.负压伤口治疗的经济有效替代方案。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Feb 6;5(2):e1211. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001211. eCollection 2017 Feb.