McIvor A J
Department of History, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Br J Ind Med. 1987 Nov;44(11):724-32. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.11.724.
The evolution of the concept of industrial fatigue and the responses of employers and the government in Britain to research initiatives in this field of industrial medicine up to the end of the first world war is explored. The discussion dovetails in with the broader debate about the characteristics and dissemination of scientific labour management in Britain. The first section focuses on attitudes towards human energy expenditure and overwork in the nineteenth century. Following this is a discussion of the shorter hours movement of the 1890s, the important experiment at the Manchester engineering firm of Mather and Platt, and the reaction of British employers and the government to this. Finally, a brief analysis is made of the progress in research into workers' health, fatigue, and efficiency during the 1914-8 war, particularly concentrating on the role of the Health and Munition Workers Committee in pioneering the scientific study of industrial medicine. This led directly to the establishment of the Industrial Fatigue Research Board in 1918. Though there are significant caveats, it is argued that before the first world war a wide gap existed between research findings, best practice, and the common workshop experience and that in general British management (with some notable exceptions) grossly neglected the human element in production, ignored human physiological and psychological limitations, and hence both created and exacerbated serious problems of mental and physical fatigue and overstrain.
本文探讨了工业疲劳概念的演变,以及在第一次世界大战结束前,英国雇主和政府对工业医学领域研究倡议的反应。该讨论与关于英国科学劳动管理的特点和传播的更广泛辩论相契合。第一部分重点关注19世纪对人类能量消耗和过度工作的态度。接下来讨论的是19世纪90年代的缩短工时运动、曼彻斯特工程公司马瑟和普拉特的重要实验,以及英国雇主和政府对此的反应。最后,简要分析了1914 - 18年战争期间工人健康、疲劳和效率研究的进展,特别关注健康与弹药工人委员会在开创工业医学科学研究方面的作用。这直接导致了1918年工业疲劳研究委员会的成立。尽管存在重大限制,但有人认为,在第一次世界大战之前,研究结果、最佳实践与普通车间经验之间存在巨大差距,而且总体而言,英国管理层(有一些显著例外)严重忽视了生产中的人为因素,无视人类生理和心理上的局限,从而造成并加剧了严重的身心疲劳和过度劳累问题。