• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垃圾填埋气(LFG)到电能的技术经济评估:通过现场研究和模型模拟选择最佳技术。

Techno-economic assessment of landfill gas (LFG) to electric energy: Selection of the optimal technology through field-study and model simulation.

机构信息

Design of Environmental Processes Laboratory, School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, 73100, Greece.

Design of Environmental Processes Laboratory, School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, 73100, Greece.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2021 Apr;269:128688. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128688. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128688
PMID:33189397
Abstract

Landfill Gas (LFG) is a renewable energy resource. LFG quality and production rate are determined factors for the selection of the optimal technology for electric energy production. Environmental legislation, flue gas emissions, carbon footprint and maturity of technology should also be considered. The most common process for electric energy production from LFG is by Internal Combustion Engines (ICEs), which require approximately 40% minimum methane concentration. Microturbines have been also employed for electric energy production from LFG, requiring minimum methane concentration of approximately 35%. On the other hand, a relatively novel process, Gradual Oxidation (GO), can produce electric energy from LFG at methane concentrations as low as 1.5%. The present study examines the applicability of the above technologies for electric energy production from LFG, from various cells, at the landfill of Heraklion, Crete, Greece, from an economic point of view. The LandGEM (EPA) simulation model has been modified to account for the long them reduction of methane concentration in LFG, and has been adjusted, based on field measurements. The Net Present Values (NPVs) (for 15-years and 25-years from installation) for three distinct scenarios, with total electric energy production capacity of 800 kW, per scenario (using just ICEs, combination of ICE and GO or just microturbines), were calculated. The results indicated that the most profitable scenario (among the ones studied) was the one with the use of two microturbines with capacity 400 kW, each, yielding 15-years and 25-yeasr NPVs of 2.68 and 3.69 M€, respectively, for initial capital investment of 2.24 M€.

摘要

垃圾填埋气 (LFG) 是一种可再生能源。LFG 的质量和产量是选择最佳电能生产技术的决定因素。环境法规、废气排放、碳足迹和技术成熟度也应加以考虑。从 LFG 中生产电能最常见的工艺是使用内燃机 (ICE),其需要大约 40%的最小甲烷浓度。微燃气轮机也已用于从 LFG 中生产电能,其需要大约 35%的最小甲烷浓度。另一方面,一种相对较新的工艺——逐渐氧化 (GO),可以在甲烷浓度低至 1.5%的情况下从 LFG 中产生电能。本研究从经济角度研究了上述技术在希腊克里特岛赫拉克利翁垃圾填埋场从各种电池中生产电能的适用性。LandGEM(EPA)模拟模型已进行了修改,以考虑 LFG 中甲烷浓度的长期降低,并根据现场测量进行了调整。三个不同场景的净现值 (NPV)(安装后 15 年和 25 年),每个场景的总电能生产能力为 800kW(仅使用 ICE、ICE 和 GO 的组合或仅使用微燃气轮机)。结果表明,最有利可图的场景(在所研究的场景中)是使用两个容量为 400kW 的微燃气轮机,每个场景的 15 年和 25 年 NPV 分别为 2.68 和 3.69M€,初始投资为 2.24M€。

相似文献

1
Techno-economic assessment of landfill gas (LFG) to electric energy: Selection of the optimal technology through field-study and model simulation.垃圾填埋气(LFG)到电能的技术经济评估:通过现场研究和模型模拟选择最佳技术。
Chemosphere. 2021 Apr;269:128688. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128688. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
Modeling landfill gas potential and potential energy recovery from Thohoyandou landfill site, South Africa.模拟南非托霍延多垃圾填埋场的垃圾填埋气潜力和潜在能源回收。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020 Aug;70(8):820-833. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1778137.
3
Techno-economic and sustainability analysis of siloxane removal from landfill gas used for electricity generation.从用于发电的填埋气中去除硅氧烷的技术经济与可持续性分析
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jul 15;314:115070. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115070. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
4
Estimation of landfill gas production and potential utilization in a South Africa landfill.南非一座垃圾填埋场的填埋气产量估算及潜在利用
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Jan;73(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2072976. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Quantification of landfill gas generation and renewable energy potential in arid countries: Case study of Bahrain.量化干旱国家的垃圾填埋气产生和可再生能源潜力:以巴林为例。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 Oct;38(10):1110-1118. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20933338. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
6
Harnessing landfill gas (LFG) for electricity: A strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Jakarta (Indonesia).利用垃圾填埋气(LFG)发电:缓解雅加达(印度尼西亚)温室气体(GHG)排放的策略。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113882. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113882. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
7
Climate impact of an optimised gas treatment on old landfills.优化的气体处理对旧垃圾填埋场的气候影响。
Waste Manag Res. 2022 Aug;40(8):1189-1198. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211070190. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
Technical and economic evaluation of biogas capture and treatment for the Piedras Blancas landfill in Córdoba, Argentina.阿根廷科尔多瓦省皮德拉斯布兰卡垃圾填埋场沼气捕获与处理的技术经济评估。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):537-549. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1243594. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
9
Life-Cycle Assessment of a Regulatory Compliant U.S. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill.美国符合法规的城市固体废物填埋场的生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 19;55(20):13583-13592. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02526. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
10
Modeling methane oxidation in landfill cover soils as indicator of functional stability with respect to gas management.以甲烷氧化为模型,研究垃圾覆盖土壤的功能稳定性及其对气体管理的指示作用。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 Jan;69(1):13-22. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1500403. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling of methane emissions from waste disposal sites at selected Egyptian governorates and potential energy production from waste-to-energy projects.埃及部分省份垃圾处理场甲烷排放建模及垃圾能源化项目的潜在能源生产
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 23;14(1):25040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73572-9.
2
Exploring the potential of biofiltration for mitigating harmful gaseous emissions from small or old landfills: a review.探索生物过滤在减轻小型或老旧垃圾填埋场有害气体排放方面的潜力:综述
Biodegradation. 2024 Aug;35(5):469-491. doi: 10.1007/s10532-024-10082-5. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Can the implementation of household waste classification mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in Beijing? A comprehensive analysis of recent trends and future scenarios.
北京实施生活垃圾强制分类能否减缓温室气体排放?近期趋势与未来情景的综合分析
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 1;9(12):e23132. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23132. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Life Cycle Analysis of Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Produced by Tri-Reforming and Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (TriFTS) of Landfill Gas.用垃圾填埋气进行三重重整和费托合成(TriFTS)生产的费托柴油的生命周期分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Dec 5;57(48):19602-19611. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02162. Epub 2023 Nov 13.