Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Urol Oncol. 2021 Feb;39(2):131.e1-131.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
It is unknown, whether metastatic prostate cancer (CaP) patients with intermediate life expectancy (5-10 years) should be considered for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the prostate. We addressed this void.
Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016), we identified 835 M1a or M1b CaP substaged patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/ml and with intermediate life expectancy (LE) 5 to 10 years, treated with EBRT or no EBRT. Inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW), Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-regression models (CRMs) were used.
Overall, 179 (21.4%) patients received EBRT and 656 (78.6%) did not. EBRT rates increased from 13.9 to 23.8% (2004-2016; P= 0.04). After IPTW-adjustment, median OS was 45 vs. 35 months, in EBRT vs. no EBRT patients (P < 0.001). In IPTW-adjusted Cox-regression models, EBRT independently predicted lower overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.7, CI 0.61-0.89; P= 0.001). After stratification according to M1 substages, EBRT was associated with lower overall mortality in M1a (HR: 0.2, CI 0.05-0.91; P= 0.03) and M1b (HR: 0.7, CI 0.55-0.88; P = 0.003) substages.
EBRT was associated with lower mortality in metastatic CaP patients with low PSA and intermediate LE (5-10 years). In consequence, greater consideration for EBRT should be given in those patients. However, it is important to consider study limitations until clinical trials confirm the proposed benefit.
对于预期寿命(5-10 年)为中期的转移性前列腺癌(CaP)患者,是否应考虑进行前列腺外束放射治疗(EBRT)尚不清楚。我们针对这一空白进行了研究。
我们在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2004-2016 年)中,鉴定了 835 例前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)<20ng/ml 且预期寿命(LE)为 5 至 10 年的 M1a 或 M1b CaP 亚分期患者,他们接受了 EBRT 或未接受 EBRT 治疗。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)、Kaplan-Meier 图和 Cox 回归模型(CRMs)。
总体而言,179 例(21.4%)患者接受了 EBRT,656 例(78.6%)未接受 EBRT。EBRT 率从 2004 年的 13.9%增加到 2016 年的 23.8%(P=0.04)。经过 IPTW 调整后,EBRT 组和未接受 EBRT 组的中位 OS 分别为 45 个月和 35 个月(P<0.001)。在经过 IPTW 调整的 Cox 回归模型中,EBRT 独立地预测了更低的总体死亡率(风险比 [HR]:0.7,CI 0.61-0.89;P=0.001)。根据 M1 亚分期进行分层后,EBRT 与 M1a(HR:0.2,CI 0.05-0.91;P=0.03)和 M1b(HR:0.7,CI 0.55-0.88;P=0.003)亚分期的患者的总体死亡率降低相关。
对于 PSA 低且预期寿命(5-10 年)为中期的转移性 CaP 患者,EBRT 与死亡率降低相关。因此,应更多地考虑对这些患者进行 EBRT。但是,在临床试验证实所提出的益处之前,需要考虑研究的局限性。