Suppr超能文献

双能量CT血管造影在周围动脉闭塞性疾病中的应用:不同图像重建方法的诊断准确性

Dual-Energy CT Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Image Reconstruction Approaches.

作者信息

Kosmala Aleksander, Weng Andreas Max, Schmid Andrea, Gruschwitz Philipp, Grunz Jan-Peter, Bley Thorsten Alexander, Petritsch Bernhard

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2022 Apr;29 Suppl 4:S59-S68. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.028. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of five DE-CTA image reconstruction approaches for detection of lower extremity arterial stenosis using digital subtraction angiography as reference standard.

METHODS

One hundred and eleven patients (63 males; mean age, 75.0 ± 9.7 years) who underwent clinically indicated lower extremity DE-CTA were included in this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Routine multiplanar reconstructions (MPR), curved MPR (cMPR), DE-bone-and-calcified-plaque-subtraction (DE-CS), maximum-intensity projections (MIP), and DE-CS MPR were visually assessed for stenoses > 50%. Automatic objective stenosis grading was implemented on cMPRs. The effect of vessel calcification and luminal contrast on diagnostic performance was evaluated.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for stenosis detection was high (96.4%-98.6%) with no significant differences among reconstruction approaches. Specificity (74.9%-92.2%) and accuracy (86.9%-94.5%) varied significantly. Pronounced vessel wall calcification and inferior intraluminal contrast attenuation had no significant effect on sensitivity (calcification: p = 0.167 for MPR; 0.567 DE-CS MPR; 0.057 DE-CS MIP; 0.272 cMPR; 0.185 automatic grading; contrast attenuation: p = 1.000 for all reconstructions), but lead to reduced specificity in visual assessment (calcification: p = 0.002 for MPR; <0.001 DE-CS MPR, DE-CS MIP, and cMPR; contrast attenuation: p = 0.844 for MPR; 0.001 DE-CS MPR and DE-CS MIP; 0.420 cMPR). Routine MPR showed highest overall diagnostic performance.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of image reconstruction approach, vessel calcification and intraluminal contrast attenuation, lower extremity DE-CTA possesses high sensitivity for detection of significant stenoses. Specificity and accuracy vary between reconstruction approaches, indicating the need for additional verification of potential stenotic lesions by use of MPR to reduce the number of unnecessary invasive DSAs due to false-positive CTA findings.

摘要

目的

以数字减影血管造影为参考标准,评估五种双能量CT血管造影(DE-CTA)图像重建方法检测下肢动脉狭窄的诊断准确性。

方法

本项经机构审查委员会批准、符合健康保险流通与责任法案的回顾性研究纳入了111例接受临床指征下肢DE-CTA检查的患者(63例男性;平均年龄75.0±9.7岁)。对常规多平面重建(MPR)、曲面MPR(cMPR)、双能量去骨和钙化斑块减除(DE-CS)、最大密度投影(MIP)以及DE-CS MPR进行视觉评估,以检测狭窄程度>50% 的情况。对cMPR实施自动客观狭窄分级。评估血管钙化和管腔对比度对诊断性能的影响。

结果

狭窄检测的敏感性较高(96.4%-98.6%),各重建方法之间无显著差异。特异性(74.9%-92.2%)和准确性(86.9%-94.5%)差异显著。明显血管壁钙化和管腔内对比度降低对敏感性无显著影响(钙化:MPR为p = 0.167;DE-CS MPR为0.567;DE-CS MIP为0.057;cMPR为0.272;自动分级为0.185;对比度降低:所有重建方法均为p = 1.000),但在视觉评估中会导致特异性降低(钙化:MPR为p = 0.002;DE-CS MPR、DE-CS MIP和cMPR均<0.001;对比度降低:MPR为p = 0.844;DE-CS MPR和DE-CS MIP为0.001;cMPR为0.420)。常规MPR显示出最高的总体诊断性能。

结论

无论采用何种图像重建方法、血管钙化和管腔内对比度如何,下肢DE-CTA对显著狭窄的检测均具有较高的敏感性。不同重建方法的特异性和准确性有所不同,这表明需要通过MPR对潜在狭窄病变进行额外验证,以减少因CTA假阳性结果导致的不必要的有创数字减影血管造影检查数量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验