Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Contraception. 2021 Apr;103(4):225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
OBJECTIVE(S): We describe contraception and dual method use among women with HIV initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a U.S. clinical trial and examine associated factors.
We analyzed data from ART-naïve women aged 45 years and under initiating one of 3 regimens as part of A5257 (May 2009-June 2011) which required that women at risk for pregnancy use contraception. We classified self-reported methods as more effective (Tier 1 [intrauterine device, hysterectomy, permanent contraception] and Tier 2 [hormonal rings, patches, injections, pills]) versus less effective (Tier 3 [condoms alone] and Tier 4 [withdrawal, none]). We used logistic regression models to assess associations with use of (a) more effective, and (b) dual methods (condoms with a more effective method).
Of 285 women, majority were Black (59%), had annual income <$20,000 (54%), and had government insurance (68%). The most common contraceptive methods reported at baseline were permanent contraception (37%), male condoms alone (31%), and injectable progestin (8%); 41% and 16% reported Tier 1 and 2 use, respectively; 36% reported dual method use. Use of more effective and dual methods did not change 48 and 96 weeks after ART initiation (p > 0.05). In multivariable analyses, baseline use of more effective and dual methods was associated with age at least 40 years versus 18 to 29 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12, 9.35) and having at least one child (OR 2.31, 95%CI 1.27, 4.20).
In women initiating modern ART in a clinical trial, permanent contraception was common, while use of other more effective contraceptive methods was low and did not change after ART initiation. Efforts are needed to improve integration of family planning services for women within the context of HIV clinical trials.
The findings highlight the importance of improving integration of HIV and family planning services, including in the context of clinical trials.
我们描述了在美国一项临床试验中开始接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的 HIV 感染者的避孕和双重方法使用情况,并研究了相关因素。
我们分析了 2009 年 5 月至 2011 年 6 月期间作为 A5257 研究(一项随机、开放标签、多中心临床试验,比较 3 种方案在 HIV 感染者中的疗效)一部分入组的、年龄在 45 岁及以下的、ART 初治的女性的数据,这些女性需要有妊娠风险的患者使用避孕方法。我们将自我报告的方法分为更有效的方法(第 1 层[宫内节育器、子宫切除术、永久性避孕]和第 2 层[激素环、贴片、注射、药丸])和不太有效的方法(第 3 层[仅避孕套]和第 4 层[撤出、无保护措施])。我们使用逻辑回归模型评估了以下因素与使用(a)更有效的方法和(b)双重方法(避孕套与更有效的方法联合使用)的关联:(a)更有效的方法,和(b)双重方法(避孕套与更有效的方法联合使用)。
在 285 名女性中,大多数为黑人(59%),年收入<20000 美元(54%),并享受政府保险(68%)。基线时报告的最常见避孕方法为永久性避孕(37%)、单独使用男用避孕套(31%)和注射孕激素(8%);分别有 41%和 16%报告使用了第 1 层和第 2 层方法;36%报告使用了双重方法。在开始接受 ART 后 48 和 96 周,更有效的方法和双重方法的使用没有变化(p > 0.05)。多变量分析显示,与 18 至 29 岁相比,年龄至少 40 岁(比值比[OR]4.46,95%置信区间[CI]2.12,9.35)和至少有一个孩子(OR 2.31,95%CI 1.27,4.20)与基线时使用更有效的方法和双重方法相关。
在临床试验中开始接受现代 ART 的女性中,永久性避孕方法很常见,而其他更有效的避孕方法使用率较低,且在开始接受 ART 后并未改变。需要努力改善在 HIV 临床试验中为女性提供计划生育服务的整合。
研究结果强调了改善 HIV 与计划生育服务整合的重要性,包括在临床试验中。