分析痰/气管吸出物和鼻咽样本，使用实验室开发的检测方法和 Panther Fusion 系统检测 SARS-CoV-2。
Analysis of sputum/tracheal aspirate and nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection by laboratory-developed test and Panther Fusion system.
机构信息
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
出版信息
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115228. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115228. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Abstract
In this study, 127 sputum/tracheal aspirate specimens were evaluated by a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR method and Fusion SARS-CoV-2 assay. These specimens were collected from the patients who have nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples being used for SARS-CoV-2 detection previously or simultaneously. The overall agreement was 96% between the lower respiratory tract (LRT) and NPS samples, suggesting that LRT specimens could be an option for patients who develop a productive cough or those receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
摘要
本研究采用实验室开发的实时 RT-PCR 方法和 Fusion SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒对 127 份痰/气管吸出物标本进行了评估。这些标本是从先前或同时采集了用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的鼻咽拭子（NPS）样本的患者中收集的。下呼吸道（LRT）样本与 NPS 样本之间的总体一致性为 96%，这表明对于出现有痰咳嗽或接受有创机械通气的患者，LRT 标本可能是一种选择。
相似文献
1
Analysis of sputum/tracheal aspirate and nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection by laboratory-developed test and Panther Fusion system.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115228. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115228. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115200. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115200. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
3
Rapid Implementation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Emergency Use Authorization RT-PCR Testing and Experience at an Academic Medical Institution.
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Feb;23(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
4
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in different clinical specimens: A critical review.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2021 Jan 2;49(1):159-164. doi: 10.15586/aei.v49i1.60. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: Quest for the best choice.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249408. eCollection 2021.
6
Development and Evaluation of AccuPower COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 10;17(2):e0263341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263341. eCollection 2022.
7
Validation of a modified CDC assay and performance comparison with the NeuMoDx™ and DiaSorin® automated assays for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104688. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104688. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Clinical performance and sample freeze-thaw stability of the cobas®6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs and lower respiratory specimens.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104686. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104686. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
9
Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):719-725. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26349. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
10
Combined SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing and respiratory virus panel RT-PCR on the Hologic Panther Fusion system.
J Clin Virol. 2021 May;138:104792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104792. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
引用本文的文献
1
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
2
Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19; Biosafety and Pre-analytical Recommendations.
Iran J Pathol. 2023 Summer;18(3):244-256. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2023.1988405.3061. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
3
Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of the STANDARD M10 Assay for the Molecular Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Point-of-Care and Critical Care Settings.
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 27;11(9):2465. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092465.
4
Advances in the Rapid Diagnostic of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 10;12:807253. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.807253. eCollection 2022.
5
Updating the use of nano-biosensors as promising devices for the diagnosis of coronavirus family members: A systematic review.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022 Mar 20;211:114608. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114608. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
6
Different Respiratory Samples for COVID-19 Detection by Standard and Direct Quantitative RT-PCR: A Literature Review.
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Summer;20(3):285-299. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2021.115458.15383.
7
Comparison of nasopharyngeal swab and nasopharyngeal aspiration in adults for SARS-CoV-2 identification using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6693-6695. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27250. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
8
Discordant SARS-CoV-2 Detection in the Nasopharynx Versus Trachea for Patients With Tracheostomies.
Laryngoscope. 2021 Oct;131(10):E2634-E2638. doi: 10.1002/lary.29617. Epub 2021 May 14.
9
Biological characteristics and biomarkers of novel SARS-CoV-2 facilitated rapid development and implementation of diagnostic tools and surveillance measures.
Biosens Bioelectron. 2021 Apr 1;177:112969. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.112969. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
本文引用的文献
1
SARS-CoV-2 detection in different respiratory sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
EBioMedicine. 2020 Sep;59:102903. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102903. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Differences of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Shedding Duration in Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens Among Adult Inpatients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1876-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
3
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
SARS-CoV-2-Positive Sputum and Feces After Conversion of Pharyngeal Samples in Patients With COVID-19.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 16;172(12):832-834. doi: 10.7326/M20-0991. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
5
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
6
Detection of respiratory viruses in sputum from adults by use of automated multiplex PCR.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct;52(10):3590-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01523-14. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
7
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.
Zotero 插件