Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, No.11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Beijing Airport Hospital, Beijing, China.
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 16;18(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01787-4.
The placebo response in patients with diabetes mellitus is very common. A systematic evaluation needs to be updated with the current evidence about the placebo response in diabetes mellitus and the associated factors in clinical trials of anti-diabetic medicine.
Literature research was conducted in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published between the date of inception and June 2019. Randomized placebo-controlled trials conducted in type 1and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM/T2DM) were included. Random-effects model and meta-regression analysis were accordingly used. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42014009373.
Significantly weight elevation (effect size (ES) = 0.33 kg, 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.61 kg) was observed in patients with placebo treatments in T1DM subgroup while significantly HbA1c reduction (ES = - 0.12%, 95% CI, - 0.16 to - 0.07%) and weight reduction (ES = - 0.40 kg, 95% CI, - 0.50 to - 0.29 kg) were observed in patients with placebo treatments in T2DM subgroup. Greater HbA1c reduction was observed in patients with injectable placebo treatments (ES = - 0.22%, 95% CI, - 0.32 to - 0.11%) versus oral types (ES = - 0.09%, 95% CI, - 0.14 to - 0.04%) in T2DM (P = 0.03). Older age (β = - 0.01, 95% CI, - 0.02 to - 0.01, P < 0.01) and longer diabetes duration (β = - 0.02, 95% CI, - 0.03 to - 0.21 × 10, P = 0.03) was significantly associated with more HbA1c reduction by placebo in T1DM. However, younger age (β = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03, P = 0.01), lower male percentage (β = 0.01, 95% CI, 0.22 × 10, 0.01, P < 0.01), higher baseline BMI (β = - 0.02, 95% CI, - 0.04 to - 0.26 × 10, P = 0.02), and higher baseline HbA1c (β = - 0.09, 95% CI, - 0.16 to - 0.01, P = 0.02) were significantly associated with more HbA1c reduction by placebo in T2DM. Shorter diabetes duration (β = 0.06, 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.10, P < 0.01) was significantly associated with more weight reduction by placebo in T2DM. However, the associations between baseline BMI, baseline HbA1c, and placebo response were insignificant after the adjusted analyses.
The placebo response in diabetes mellitus was systematically outlined. Age, sex, disease severity (indirectly reflected by baseline BMI and baseline HbA1c), and disease duration were associated with placebo response in diabetes mellitus. The association between baseline BMI, baseline HbA1c, and placebo response may be the result of regression to the mean.
糖尿病患者的安慰剂反应非常常见。需要对当前关于糖尿病安慰剂反应的证据进行系统评估,并对糖尿病药物临床试验中的相关因素进行评估。
在 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 中心对照试验注册库和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中,检索了截至 2019 年 6 月发表的研究。纳入了 1 型和 2 型糖尿病(T1DM/T2DM)的随机安慰剂对照试验。采用随机效应模型和荟萃回归分析。本荟萃分析在 PROSPERO 中注册为 CRD42014009373。
在 T1DM 亚组中,接受安慰剂治疗的患者体重显著增加(效应大小(ES)=0.33kg,95%置信区间,0.03 至 0.61kg),而在 T2DM 亚组中,接受安慰剂治疗的患者 HbA1c 显著降低(ES=-0.12%,95%置信区间,-0.16 至 -0.07%)和体重减轻(ES=-0.40kg,95%置信区间,-0.50 至 -0.29kg)。在 T2DM 中,接受注射用安慰剂治疗的患者 HbA1c 降低幅度大于口服类型(ES=-0.22%,95%置信区间,-0.32 至 -0.11% 比 ES=-0.09%,95%置信区间,-0.14 至 -0.04%)(P=0.03)。在 T1DM 中,年龄较大(β=-0.01,95%置信区间,-0.02 至 -0.01,P<0.01)和糖尿病病程较长(β=-0.02,95%置信区间,-0.03 至 -0.21×10,P=0.03)与安慰剂治疗时 HbA1c 降低幅度显著相关。然而,在 T2DM 中,年龄较小(β=0.02,95%置信区间,0.01 至 0.03,P=0.01)、男性比例较低(β=0.01,95%置信区间,0.22×10,0.01,P<0.01)、基线 BMI 较高(β=-0.02,95%置信区间,-0.04 至 -0.26×10,P=0.02)和基线 HbA1c 较高(β=-0.09,95%置信区间,-0.16 至 -0.01,P=0.02)与安慰剂治疗时 HbA1c 降低幅度显著相关。糖尿病病程较短(β=0.06,95%置信区间,0.06 至 0.10,P<0.01)与安慰剂治疗时体重减轻幅度显著相关。然而,在调整分析后,基线 BMI、基线 HbA1c 和安慰剂反应之间的关联不再显著。
系统概述了糖尿病中的安慰剂反应。年龄、性别、疾病严重程度(间接反映为基线 BMI 和基线 HbA1c)和疾病病程与糖尿病中的安慰剂反应相关。基线 BMI、基线 HbA1c 和安慰剂反应之间的关联可能是回归均值的结果。