Mayer Michael, Borja Austin J, Hancin Emily C, Auslander Thomas, Revheim Mona-Elisabeth, Moghbel Mateen C, Werner Thomas J, Alavi Abass, Rajapakse Chamith S
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Physiol. 2020 Oct 22;11:511391. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.511391. eCollection 2020.
Molecular imaging has emerged in the past few decades as a novel means to investigate atherosclerosis. From a pathophysiological perspective, atherosclerosis is characterized by microscopic inflammation and microcalcification that precede the characteristic plaque buildup in arterial walls detected by traditional assessment methods, including anatomic imaging modalities. These processes of inflammation and microcalcification are, therefore, prime targets for molecular detection of atherosclerotic disease burden. Imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) can non-invasively assess arterial inflammation and microcalcification, respectively. FDG uptake reflects glucose metabolism, which is particularly increased in atherosclerotic plaques retaining macrophages and undergoing hypoxic stress. By contrast, NaF uptake reflects the exchange of hydroxyl groups of hydroxyapatite crystals for fluoride producing fluorapatite, a key biochemical step in calcification of atherosclerotic plaque. Here we review the existing literature on FDG and NaF imaging and their respective values in investigating the progression of atherosclerotic disease. Based on the large volume of data that have been introduced to the literature and discussed in this review, it is clear that PET imaging will have a major role to play in assessing atherosclerosis in the major and coronary arteries. However, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the potential role of FDG in investigating atherosclerosis given the vast number of studies with different designs, image acquisition methods, analyses, and interpretations. Our experience in this domain of research has suggested that NaF may be the tool of choice over FDG in assessing atherosclerosis, especially in the setting of coronary artery disease (CAD). Specifically, global NaF assessment appears to be superior in detecting plaques in tissues with high background FDG activity, such as the coronary arteries.
在过去几十年中,分子成像已成为研究动脉粥样硬化的一种新方法。从病理生理学角度来看,动脉粥样硬化的特征是微观炎症和微钙化,这些在传统评估方法(包括解剖成像模式)检测到的动脉壁特征性斑块形成之前就已存在。因此,这些炎症和微钙化过程是分子检测动脉粥样硬化疾病负担的主要目标。使用18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)和18F-氟化钠(NaF)的正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)成像可以分别无创地评估动脉炎症和微钙化。FDG摄取反映葡萄糖代谢,在保留巨噬细胞并经历缺氧应激的动脉粥样硬化斑块中葡萄糖代谢会特别增加。相比之下,NaF摄取反映了羟基磷灰石晶体的羟基与氟发生交换生成氟磷灰石,这是动脉粥样硬化斑块钙化的关键生化步骤。在此,我们综述了关于FDG和NaF成像及其在研究动脉粥样硬化疾病进展方面各自价值的现有文献。基于已引入文献并在本综述中讨论的大量数据,很明显PET成像在评估主动脉和冠状动脉的动脉粥样硬化中将发挥重要作用。然而,鉴于大量设计、图像采集方法、分析和解释各不相同的研究,很难就FDG在研究动脉粥样硬化中的潜在作用得出明确结论。我们在该研究领域的经验表明,在评估动脉粥样硬化时,尤其是在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的情况下,NaF可能是比FDG更合适的工具。具体而言,在背景FDG活性较高的组织(如冠状动脉)中检测斑块时,整体NaF评估似乎更具优势。