Emergency Military Clinical Hospital, 7-9 General Henri Mathias Berthelot Street, 700483 Iasi, Romania.
"Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 University Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 27;2020:8814092. doi: 10.1155/2020/8814092. eCollection 2020.
Although rarely life-threatening on short term, atrial fibrillation leads to increased mortality and decreased quality of life through its complications, including heart failure and stroke. Recent studies highlight the benefits of maintaining sinus rhythm. However, pharmacological long-term rhythm control strategies may be shadowed by associated proarrhythmic effects. At the same time, electrical cardioversion is limited to hospitals, while catheter ablation therapy, although effective, is invasive and is dedicated to specific patients, usually with low amounts of atrial fibrosis (preferably Utah I-II). Cardiac optogenetics allows influencing the heart's electrical activity by applying specific wavelength light pulses to previously engineered cardiomyocytes into expressing microbial derived light-sensitive proteins called opsins. The resulting ion influx may give rise to either hyperpolarizing or depolarizing currents, thus offering a therapeutic potential in cardiac electrophysiology, including pacing, resynchronization, and arrhythmia termination. Optogenetic atrial fibrillation cardioversion might be achieved by inducing a conduction block or filling of the excitable gap. The authors agree that transmural opsin expression and appropriate illumination with an exposure time longer than the arrhythmia cycle length are necessary to achieve successful arrhythmia termination. However, the efficiency and safety of biological cardioversion in humans remain to be seen, as well as side effects such as immune reactions and loss of opsin expression. The possibility of delivering pain-free shocks with out-of-hospital biological cardioversion is tempting; however, there are several issues that need to be addressed first: applicability and safety in humans, long-term behaviour, anticoagulation requirements, and fibrosis interactions.
虽然心房颤动在短期内很少危及生命,但它会通过其并发症(包括心力衰竭和中风)导致死亡率增加和生活质量下降。最近的研究强调了维持窦性心律的好处。然而,药物长期节律控制策略可能会受到相关致心律失常作用的影响。同时,电复律仅限于医院,而导管消融治疗虽然有效,但具有侵入性,并且专门针对特定患者,通常心房纤维化程度较低(最好是 Utah I-II 级)。心脏光遗传学允许通过应用特定波长的光脉冲到先前工程化的表达微生物衍生的光敏感蛋白(称为视蛋白)的心肌细胞来影响心脏的电活动。由此产生的离子内流可能会引起去极化或超极化电流,从而为心脏电生理学提供治疗潜力,包括起搏、再同步和心律失常终止。光遗传学心房颤动转复可能通过诱导传导阻滞或兴奋间隙填充来实现。作者认为,需要跨壁视蛋白表达和适当的光照,光照时间长于心律失常周期长度,才能成功终止心律失常。然而,生物转复在人类中的效率和安全性,以及免疫反应和视蛋白表达丧失等副作用,仍有待观察。用非医院生物转复进行无痛电击的可能性很诱人;然而,首先需要解决几个问题:在人类中的适用性和安全性、长期行为、抗凝要求和纤维化相互作用。