• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较玻利维亚一个疫病流行地区小麦穗疫病的时间发展情况。

Comparing the Temporal Development of Wheat Spike Blast Epidemics in a Region of Bolivia Where the Disease Is Endemic.

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691.

Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2021 Jan;105(1):96-107. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-20-0876-RE. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1094/PDIS-04-20-0876-RE
PMID:33197378
Abstract

Epidemics of wheat blast, caused the pathotype of , were studied in the Santa Cruz del la Sierra region of Bolivia to quantify and compare the temporal dynamics of the disease under different growing conditions. Six plots of a susceptible wheat cultivar were planted at Cuatro Cañadas (CC), Okinawa 1 (OK1), and Okinawa 2 (OK2) in 2015. Spike blast incidence (INC) and severity (SEV) and leaf blast severity (LEAF) were quantified in each plot at regular intervals on a 10 × 10 grid ( = 100 clusters of spikes), beginning at head emergence (Feekes growth stage 10.5), for a total of nine assessments at CC, six at OK1, and six at OK2. Spike blast increased over time for 20 to 30 days before approaching a mean INC of 100% and a mean SEV of 60 to 75%. The logistic model was the most appropriate for describing the temporal dynamics of spike blast. The highest absolute rates of disease increase occurred earliest at OK1 and latest at OK2, and in all cases it coincided with major rain events. Estimated values (initial blast intensity) were significantly ( < 0.05) higher at OK1 than at CC or OK2, whereas values (the logistic rate parameter) were significantly higher at OK2 than at CC or OK1. It took about 10 fewer days for SEV to reach 10, 15, or 20% at OK1 compared with OK2 and CC. Based on survival analyses, the survivor functions for time to 10, 15 and 20% SEV (s) were significantly different between OK1 and the other locations, with the probabilities of SEV reaching the thresholds being highest at OK1. LEAF at 21 days after Feekes 10.5 had a significant effect on s at OK1. For every 5% increase in LEAF, the chance of SEV reaching the thresholds by day 21 increased by 30 to 55%.

摘要

在玻利维亚圣克鲁斯德拉谢拉地区研究了由引起的小麦穗疫病流行,以量化和比较不同种植条件下疾病的时间动态。2015 年在 Cuatro Cañadas (CC)、Okinawa 1 (OK1) 和 Okinawa 2 (OK2) 种植了易感小麦品种的六个地块。在每个地块上,从穗出现(Feekes 生长阶段 10.5)开始,每隔一定时间在 10×10 网格(= 100 个穗簇)上量化穗疫病发生率(INC)和严重度(SEV)以及叶疫病严重度(LEAF),共进行了九次评估在 CC 进行了六次,在 OK1 进行了六次,在 OK2 进行了六次。穗疫病在头出现后 20 到 30 天内逐渐增加,然后接近 100%的平均 INC 和 60 到 75%的平均 SEV。逻辑模型最适合描述穗疫病的时间动态。在 OK1 最早,在 OK2 最晚,在所有情况下都与主要降雨事件同时发生,疾病增加的绝对速率最快。估计值(初始疫病强度)在 OK1 显著(<0.05)高于 CC 或 OK2,而值(逻辑率参数)在 OK2 显著高于 CC 或 OK1。SEV 达到 10%、15%或 20%的时间在 OK1 比在 OK2 和 CC 少了大约 10 天。基于生存分析,SEV 达到 10%、15%和 20%的生存函数(s)在 OK1 与其他地点之间存在显著差异,SEV 达到阈值的概率在 OK1 最高。在 Feekes 10.5 后 21 天的 LEAF 对 OK1 的 s 有显著影响。LEAF 每增加 5%,SEV 在第 21 天达到阈值的机会增加 30%至 55%。

相似文献

1
Comparing the Temporal Development of Wheat Spike Blast Epidemics in a Region of Bolivia Where the Disease Is Endemic.比较玻利维亚一个疫病流行地区小麦穗疫病的时间发展情况。
Plant Dis. 2021 Jan;105(1):96-107. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-20-0876-RE. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
Quantifying the Effects of Temperature and Relative Humidity on the Development of Wheat Blast Incited by the Lolium Pathotype of .量化温度和相对湿度对由燕麦叶枯病菌引起的小麦叶锈病发展的影响。
Plant Dis. 2020 Oct;104(10):2622-2633. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-19-2709-RE. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
Temporal Dynamics of Wheat Blast Epidemics and Disease Measurements Using Multispectral Imagery.利用多光谱图像研究小麦赤霉病的时空动态和病害测量。
Phytopathology. 2020 Feb;110(2):393-405. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-19-0297-R. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
4
Detection and characterization of fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum) causing wheat blast disease on rain-fed grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Zambia.检测和鉴定在赞比亚雨养种植小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)上引起小麦穗疫病的真菌(Magnaporthe oryzae 小麦专化型)。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 21;15(9):e0238724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238724. eCollection 2020.
5
Novel Sources of Wheat Head Blast Resistance in Modern Breeding Lines and Wheat Wild Relatives.现代育成品种和小麦野生近缘植物中新型小麦赤霉病抗性来源。
Plant Dis. 2020 Jan;104(1):35-43. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-19-0985-RE. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
Wheat spike blast: genetic interventions for effective management.小麦穗疫病:有效管理的遗传干预措施。
Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Jun;49(6):5483-5494. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07356-7. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Weather-Based Logistic Regression Models for Predicting Wheat Head Blast Epidemics.基于天气的 logistic 回归模型预测小麦穗发芽病害。
Plant Dis. 2024 Jul;108(7):2206-2213. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-23-2513-RE. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
8
Specific Detection of the Wheat Blast Pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum) by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification.利用环介导等温扩增技术特异性检测小麦赤霉病菌(稻瘟病菌)。
Plant Dis. 2018 Dec;102(12):2550-2559. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-18-0512-RE. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Climate Suitability for Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum Pathotype in the United States.美国稻瘟病菌小麦致病型的气候适宜性
Plant Dis. 2016 Oct;100(10):1979-1987. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1006-RE. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
10
Are Mostly Host-Specialized with Limited Reciprocal Cross-Infection Between Wheat and Endemic Grasses in Minas Gerais, Brazil.主要宿主专一,在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州的小麦和当地禾本科植物之间存在有限的相互交叉感染。
Phytopathology. 2024 Jan;114(1):226-240. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-23-0024-R. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling risk of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum-induced disease development on canola and dry bean using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法对油菜和干豆上的核盘菌诱导病害发展进行风险建模。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04743-1.