Skåne University Hospital, Sweden; Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Sweden.
Skåne University Hospital, Sweden; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Sep;27(9):1345.e7-1345.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) at risk for infective endocarditis (IE) need to be identified because they should undergo echocardiography. We validated previous scoring systems for IE risk determination and evaluated whether time to blood culture positivity (TTP) could improve scoring systems.
This retrospective population-based study included adults with SAB in 2016 in a derivation cohort and those from 2017 in a validation cohort. TTP was compared between patients with and without IE. A new score including TTP was constructed using a least absolute shrinkage selection operator. The new POSITIVE score was compared to the previously described PREDICT and VIRSTA scores.
A total of 465 episodes with SAB were included in the derivation cohort, of which 38 (8.2%) represented IE. Median (interquartile range) TTP was significantly shorter in episodes with IE, at 8.7 (7.7-10.6) hours compared to those without, at 13.3 (10.5-16.5) hours. When using a cutoff at 13 hours, TTP had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI), 91-100) and specificity of 52% (95% CI, 47-57) for IE. The POSITIVE score included TTP, intravenous drug use, embolizations and presence of preexisting heart conditions. It had a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 76-99) and a specificity of 70% (95% CI, 66-74) in the validation cohort. The performance of POSITIVE was superior to PREDICT, and the specificity was higher than that of VIRSTA.
TTP, either by itself or as part of the POSITIVE score, can be used to identify patients with SAB at low risk for IE. Further validation is needed because TTP is sensitive to several external factors.
金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)合并感染性心内膜炎(IE)风险患者需要进行超声心动图检查。本研究旨在验证既往 IE 风险评分系统,并评估血培养阳性时间(TTP)是否能改善评分系统。
本回顾性基于人群的研究纳入了 2016 年 derivation 队列中的成人 SAB 患者和 2017 年 validation 队列中的 SAB 患者。比较了 IE 患者和非 IE 患者之间的 TTP。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子构建包含 TTP 的新评分(POSITIVE 评分)。比较了新的 POSITIVE 评分与先前描述的 PREDICT 和 VIRSTA 评分。
derivation 队列共纳入 465 例 SAB 发作,其中 38 例(8.2%)为 IE。IE 组的 TTP 中位数(四分位距)明显更短,为 8.7(7.7-10.6)小时,而非 IE 组为 13.3(10.5-16.5)小时。当 TTP 截断值为 13 小时时,TTP 对 IE 的敏感性为 100%(95%置信区间[CI],91-100),特异性为 52%(95% CI,47-57)。POSITIVE 评分包括 TTP、静脉吸毒、栓塞和存在预先存在的心脏疾病。在 validation 队列中,其敏感性为 93%(95% CI,76-99),特异性为 70%(95% CI,66-74)。POSITIVE 评分的性能优于 PREDICT,且特异性高于 VIRSTA。
TTP 无论是单独使用还是作为 POSITIVE 评分的一部分,都可用于识别 SAB 合并 IE 风险较低的患者。由于 TTP 易受多种外部因素影响,因此需要进一步验证。