Fundación Centro Diagnóstico Nuclear, Av. Nazca 3449, C1417CVE, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Electrocardiol. 2020 Nov-Dec;63:134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
A new ECG method producing Precordial Bipolar Leads (PBL) enables a computerized subtraction of the electrical activity detected by the precordial V1 lead from that of the V6 electrode (V6-V1 PBL). This calculation can also be performed manually using measurements from standard simultaneous 12 lead ECG (SS12LECG) tracings. We compared the magnitude of T-waves generated by PBL V6-V1 (measured by computer) to the SS12LECG V6-V1 T-waves (measured on the tracing) to determine whether these measurements are equivalent. Although Lead I and Lead V6-V1 PBL examine almost the same right-to-left axis, we noted that Lead I and Lead V6-V1 PBL sometimes have opposite T-wave polarities. We investigated this observation further using a database containing control and patient data.
Records of 79 patients and 52 controls from the Physionet database were used to generate the V6-V1 PBL for comparison to manual calculations from the V1 and V6 unipolar T-wave measurements on the tracings. The accuracy of these measurements was validated against the computer measurements by correlation and paired t-tests.
The T-wave automated and manual measurements in patients were strongly correlated (0.9895), consistent with the premise that measurements from tracings are accurate. The V6-V1 T-wave calculation was positive in 48 of the 52 control subjects. Nearly half of the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients had discordant T-wave polarity between Lead I and V6-V1 PBL; ventriculography results on 24 of these patients identified 13 patients with apical and 11 with lateral wall motion abnormalities.
A discordant T-wave in Lead I and in the V6-V1 PBL is a potential diagnostic criterion for apical or left-lateral infarction.
一种新的心电图方法产生前间壁双极导联(PBL),可实现通过计算机从 V6 电极(V6-V1 PBL)减去前间壁 V1 导联检测到的电活动。也可以使用标准同步 12 导联心电图(SS12LECG)记录上的测量值手动执行此计算。我们比较了 PBL V6-V1 产生的 T 波幅度(通过计算机测量)与 SS12LECG V6-V1 T 波幅度(在记录上测量),以确定这些测量值是否等效。尽管导联 I 和导联 V6-V1 PBL 检查几乎相同的右到左轴,但我们注意到导联 I 和导联 V6-V1 PBL 有时具有相反的 T 波极性。我们使用包含对照和患者数据的数据库进一步研究了这一观察结果。
使用 Physionet 数据库中的 79 例患者和 52 例对照者的记录来生成 V6-V1 PBL,以与记录上的 V1 和 V6 单极 T 波测量的手动计算进行比较。通过相关性和配对 t 检验验证了这些测量值的准确性。
患者的 T 波自动和手动测量值高度相关(0.9895),这与记录上的测量值准确的前提一致。52 例对照者中,有 48 例 V6-V1 T 波计算为阳性。近一半的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者在导联 I 和 V6-V1 PBL 之间存在 T 波极性不一致;对这些患者中的 24 例进行心室造影术,发现 13 例患者存在心尖部和 11 例患者存在侧壁运动异常。
导联 I 和 V6-V1 PBL 之间的 T 波不一致是心尖部或左侧壁梗死的潜在诊断标准。