• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体公民身份与建设性违背悖论:环境动态性与道德辩护的调和。

The Paradox of Group Citizenship and Constructive Deviance: A Resolution of Environmental Dynamism and Moral Justification.

机构信息

College of Business Administration, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China.

School of Business and Tourism Management, Yunnan University, Kunming 650106, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;17(22):8371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228371.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17228371
PMID:33198286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7698231/
Abstract

Previous research on antecedents to constructive deviance remains scattered and inclusive. Our study conceptualizes constructive deviance from the perspective of ethical decision making and explores its antecedents, mechanism, and conditions. Drawing on moral licensing theory and social information processing theory, we propose that group citizenship behavior facilitates moral justification and constructive deviance when environmental dynamism is high and inhibits them when it is low; and moral justification fully mediates the relationship between the interaction of group citizenship behavior and environmental dynamism and constructive deviance. With two-wave panel data collected from 339 employees in 54 groups of five service companies in retailing, finance, and tourism randomly selected from three provinces in southern China, these hypotheses are all supported empirically. Our findings broaden the antecedents and occurrence mechanism of constructive deviance through an ethical decision-making lens. Our study contributes to the moral licensing literature by enriching the sources of moral licensing in the workplace and empirically demonstrating that moral justification may function as an underlying mechanism of moral licensing.

摘要

先前关于建设性偏离行为的前因研究仍然较为分散且包容性不足。我们的研究从道德决策的角度来理解建设性偏离行为,并探讨其前因、机制和条件。借鉴道德许可理论和社会信息加工理论,我们提出,当环境动态性高时,群体公民行为会促进道德辩护和建设性偏离,而当环境动态性低时则会抑制道德辩护和建设性偏离;道德辩护完全中介了群体公民行为与环境动态性和建设性偏离之间的相互作用关系。本研究通过来自中国南方三个省份的五个零售、金融和旅游服务公司的 54 个五人小组的 339 名员工的两波面板数据,实证检验了这些假设。我们的研究结果通过道德决策视角拓宽了建设性偏离的前因和发生机制。我们的研究通过丰富工作场所道德许可的来源,并实证证明道德辩护可能是道德许可的潜在机制,为道德许可文献做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738a/7698231/89e0e08ca092/ijerph-17-08371-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738a/7698231/0597a0e9375c/ijerph-17-08371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738a/7698231/5cd39de63504/ijerph-17-08371-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738a/7698231/89e0e08ca092/ijerph-17-08371-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738a/7698231/0597a0e9375c/ijerph-17-08371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738a/7698231/5cd39de63504/ijerph-17-08371-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/738a/7698231/89e0e08ca092/ijerph-17-08371-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Paradox of Group Citizenship and Constructive Deviance: A Resolution of Environmental Dynamism and Moral Justification.群体公民身份与建设性违背悖论:环境动态性与道德辩护的调和。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;17(22):8371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228371.
2
A cross-level study of the relationship between ethical leadership and employee constructive deviance: Effects of moral self-efficacy and psychological safety climate.道德领导与员工建设性越轨行为关系的跨层次研究:道德自我效能感和心理安全氛围的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 15;13:964787. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964787. eCollection 2022.
3
Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance.为什么好员工会做坏事:亲环境行为与职场偏差行为之间的联系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215284.
4
"Lubricant" or "Stumbling Block"?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance.“润滑剂”还是“绊脚石”?团队专制领导与创造性越轨之间的矛盾关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:835970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970. eCollection 2022.
5
From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance.从助人为乐到为虎作伥:员工志愿服务何时以及如何助长职场偏差行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Sep;105(9):944-958. doi: 10.1037/apl0000477. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
6
Influence of Paternalistic Leadership Style on Innovation Performance Based on the Research Perspective of the Mediating Effect of the Constructive Deviance of Employees.基于员工建设性越轨中介效应研究视角的家长式领导风格对创新绩效的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:719281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719281. eCollection 2021.
7
From Good Citizens to Bad Apples? The Effect of Boredom Proneness: A Moral Licensing Perspective.从好公民到害群之马?无聊倾向的影响:一种道德许可视角。
Psychol Rep. 2024 Jul 23:332941241265958. doi: 10.1177/00332941241265958.
8
Does Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Ambivalence Influence Employees' Constructive Deviance?领导-成员交换(LMX)的矛盾心理会影响员工的建设性越轨行为吗?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jan 19;14(1):70. doi: 10.3390/bs14010070.
9
For whom is patriotism blind? Examining the roles of moral intuitions and system justification.爱国主义会蒙蔽谁的双眼?审视道德直觉和制度辩护的作用。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 May;112:102811. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102811. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
10
The double-edged sword effect of ethical leadership on constructive deviance: An integrated model of two approaches based on organizational identification and normative conflict.道德领导对建设性越轨行为的双刃剑效应:基于组织认同和规范冲突的两种方法的整合模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:892395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892395. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The double-edged sword effect of ethical leadership on constructive deviance: An integrated model of two approaches based on organizational identification and normative conflict.道德领导对建设性越轨行为的双刃剑效应:基于组织认同和规范冲突的两种方法的整合模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:892395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892395. eCollection 2022.
2
"Lubricant" or "Stumbling Block"?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance.“润滑剂”还是“绊脚石”?团队专制领导与创造性越轨之间的矛盾关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:835970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Group identity and positive deviance in work groups.工作群体中的群体认同与积极偏差
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(6):730-743. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1412931. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
2
When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: How ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing.当道德型领导行为恶化时:道德型领导行为如何通过自我损耗和道德许可而变得虐待成性。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jun;101(6):815-30. doi: 10.1037/apl0000098. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
Consistency Versus Licensing Effects of Past Moral Behavior.过去道德行为的一致性与许可效应。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:363-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
4
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.社会科学研究中方法偏差的来源及控制方法建议。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
5
Vicarious moral licensing: the influence of others' past moral actions on moral behavior.替代性道德许可:他人过去道德行为对道德行为的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):702-15. doi: 10.1037/a0024552.
6
Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior.以公司名义的不道德行为:组织认同和积极互惠信念对不道德亲组织行为的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):769-80. doi: 10.1037/a0019214.
7
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.道德信誉与偏见的表达。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jul;81(1):33-43.
8
A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design.一种关于工作态度和任务设计的社会信息加工方法。
Adm Sci Q. 1978 Jun;23(2):224-53.