Suppr超能文献

可用于中低收入国家进行阴道镜检查以检测 CIN2+的便携式设备的筛查试验准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Screening test accuracy of portable devices that can be used to perform colposcopy for detecting CIN2+ in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.

The Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01121-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Portable devices that can be used to perform colposcopy may improve cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where access to colposcopy is limited. The objective of this study was to systematically review the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of these devices for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+).

METHODS

In accordance with our protocol (Prospero CRD42018104286), we searched Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials up to 9/2019. We included DTA studies, which investigated portable devices with moderate-to-high optical magnification (≥ 6×) for colposcopy, as described in the manual for Colposcopy and Treatment by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a histopathological reference standard. We used the QUADAS-2 tool to assess study quality. We examined results for sensitivity and specificity in paired forest plots, stratified by stages in the clinical pathway. We pooled estimates of test accuracy for the index test, used as an add-on to other tests, using a bivariate random-effect model.

RESULTS

We screened 1737 references and assessed 239 full-text articles for eligibility. Five single-gate DTA studies, including 2693 women, met the inclusion criteria. Studies evaluated two devices (Gynocular™ and Pocket) at different stages of the screening pathway. In three studies, which used the index test in an add-on capacity in 1273 women, we found a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.55-0.92) and specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.59-0.94). The main sources of bias were partial verification, incorporation and classification bias.

CONCLUSION

Few studies have evaluated portable devices able to perform colposcopy, so their accuracy for the detection of CIN2+ remains uncertain. Future studies should include patient-relevant and long-term outcomes, including missed cases, overtreatment, residual and recurrent disease. To meet the challenge of eliminating cervical cancer in LMIC, methods for visual assessment of the cervix need urgent redress.

摘要

背景

便携式设备可用于进行阴道镜检查,这可能会改善宫颈癌筛查在资源有限的中低收入国家(LMIC)的情况。本研究的目的是系统评价这些设备用于检测宫颈上皮内瘤变 2 级及以上(CIN2+)的诊断准确性(DTA)。

方法

根据我们的方案(PROSPERO CRD42018104286),我们检索了 Embase、Medline 和 Cochrane 对照试验注册库,检索截至 2019 年 9 月。我们纳入了 DTA 研究,这些研究使用国际癌症研究机构(IARC)的阴道镜检查和治疗手册中描述的中度至高光学放大(≥6×)的便携式设备进行阴道镜检查,并以组织病理学参考标准为金标准。我们使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估研究质量。我们在配对森林图中分层检查了疾病阶段的敏感性和特异性结果。我们使用双变量随机效应模型,对索引测试的测试准确性进行了汇总估计,将其作为其他测试的附加测试。

结果

我们筛选了 1737 篇参考文献,并对 239 篇全文文章进行了资格评估。5 项单门 DTA 研究,共纳入 2693 名女性,符合纳入标准。研究评估了两种设备(GynocularTM 和 Pocket)在不同的筛查阶段。在 3 项研究中,有 1273 名女性以附加能力使用索引测试,我们发现合并后的敏感性为 0.79(95%CI 0.55-0.92),特异性为 0.83(95%CI 0.59-0.94)。主要的偏倚来源为部分验证、纳入和分类偏倚。

结论

很少有研究评估过能够进行阴道镜检查的便携式设备,因此它们对 CIN2+检测的准确性仍不确定。未来的研究应包括患者相关和长期结局,包括漏诊病例、过度治疗、残留和复发疾病。为了应对在 LMIC 中消除宫颈癌的挑战,迫切需要改进宫颈视诊方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99cf/7670616/5f160de8b755/12905_2020_1121_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验