Biolojic Inc., 100 Cambridge St., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
AAPS J. 2020 Nov 16;23(1):3. doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00518-0.
Vedolizumab immunogenicity has been assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a ~ 0.5 μg/mL drug interference, which may underestimate on-drug immunogenicity. We aimed to compare immunogenicity results between ELISA and the new drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay (and the two versions of neutralizing assays, drug-sensitive versus drug-tolerant). The ECL assay drug tolerance is ~ 100 times higher than that of the ELISA (≥ 50 μg/mL vs. 0.5 μg/mL with a 500 ng/mL positive control), and assay sensitivity is < 5 ng/mL for both assays. Vedolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 2000 GEMINI 1 and 2 patients originally tested by ELISA and retested by ECL assay. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) impact on infusion-related reactions and pharmacokinetics (PK) was examined using descriptive statistics and population PK analyses. By ECL assay, 6% (86/1427) of patients treated with vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy tested ADA-positive. Of these, 20 patients were persistently positive and 56 had neutralizing antibodies. By ELISA, 4% (56/1434) of these patients were ADA-positive, 9 were persistently positive, and 33 had neutralizing antibodies. Among 61 patients with infusion-related reactions, 6 (10%) were ADA-positive (2 persistently positive) by ECL assay. By ELISA, 3 (5%) patients were both ADA-positive and persistently positive. Most results (96%) were similar with both assays. In the updated population PK model, ADA-positive status was estimated to increase vedolizumab linear clearance by a factor of 1.10 (95% credible interval 1.03-1.17), which is consistent with previous reports. The impact of ADA on safety and PK modeling remained generally consistent using either ELISA or ECL assay. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00783718 and NCT00783692.
维得利珠单抗的免疫原性评估使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),其药物干扰约为 0.5μg/mL,可能会低估有药物时的免疫原性。我们旨在比较 ELISA 与新的药物耐受型电化学发光(ECL)测定(以及两种中和测定方法,药物敏感型与药物耐受型)之间的免疫原性结果。ECL 测定的药物耐受度比 ELISA 高约 100 倍(对于 500ng/mL 阳性对照,≥50μg/mL 与 0.5μg/mL),两种测定方法的检测灵敏度均<5ng/mL。最初使用 ELISA 进行检测的 GEMINI 1 和 2 研究中的 2000 例患者,进行了维得利珠单抗的免疫原性评估,并用 ECL 测定进行了复测。采用描述性统计和群体药代动力学(PK)分析来检查抗药物抗体(ADA)对输注相关反应和药代动力学(PK)的影响。通过 ECL 测定,在接受诱导和维持治疗的维得利珠单抗治疗的 1427 例患者中,有 6%(86/1427)ADA 阳性。其中,20 例患者持续阳性,56 例患者具有中和抗体。在这些患者中,ELISA 检测到 4%(56/1434)ADA 阳性,9 例持续阳性,33 例具有中和抗体。在 61 例有输注相关反应的患者中,有 6 例(10%)通过 ECL 测定 ADA 阳性(2 例持续阳性)。通过 ELISA,有 3 例(5%)患者 ADA 阳性且持续阳性。两种测定方法的大多数结果(96%)相似。在更新的群体 PK 模型中,ADA 阳性状态估计会使维得利珠单抗线性清除率增加 1.10 倍(95%可信区间 1.03-1.17),这与之前的报告一致。使用 ELISA 或 ECL 测定,ADA 对安全性和 PK 模型的影响基本一致。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00783718 和 NCT00783692。