Suppr超能文献

来自市售肠溶包衣和未包衣柳氮磺吡啶片剂的磺胺吡啶的相对全身可用性。

Relative systemic availability of sulfapyridine from commercial enteric-coated and uncoated sulfasalazine tablets.

作者信息

Pieniaszek H J, Resetarits D E, Wilferth W W, Blumenthal H P, Bates T R

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Jan;19(1):39-45. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1979.tb01615.x.

Abstract

The absorption of sulfapyridine after a single 2.0-Gm oral dose of sulfasalazine, the drug of choice in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, as commercial uncoated and enteric-coated and uncoated tablets was evaluated in four healthy male adults. The peak plasma concentration of sulfapyridine after the enteric-coated tablets occurred at 20 hours on the average (compared to 14 hours for the uncoated tablets) and was only 50% of that attained from the uncoated tablets (P less than 0.05). The low relative extent of systemic availability of sulfapyridine from the enteric-coated tablets (65.5 +/- 6.3 per cent, mean +/- S.E.) compared to uncoated tablets may be due to absorption rate-dependent presystemic metabolism, since the relative extent of sulfapyridine absorption was 92.7 +/- 6.2 per cent compared to uncoated tablets. These findings suggest that enteric-coated and uncoated tablets of sulfasalazine are not bioequivalent. It remains to be determined whether the clinical efficacy of sulfasalazine from enteric-coated tablets is affected.

摘要

在四名健康成年男性中,评估了单次口服2.0克柳氮磺胺吡啶(治疗炎性肠病的首选药物)后,市售未包衣片、肠溶包衣片和未包衣片的磺胺吡啶吸收情况。肠溶包衣片后磺胺吡啶的血浆峰值浓度平均出现在20小时(未包衣片为14小时),且仅为未包衣片的50%(P小于0.05)。与未包衣片相比,肠溶包衣片的磺胺吡啶全身可用性相对程度较低(65.5±6.3%,均值±标准误),这可能是由于吸收速率依赖性的首过代谢,因为与未包衣片相比,磺胺吡啶的吸收相对程度为92.7±6.2%。这些发现表明,柳氮磺胺吡啶的肠溶包衣片和未包衣片不是生物等效的。肠溶包衣片柳氮磺胺吡啶的临床疗效是否受到影响仍有待确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验