Pieniaszek H J, Resetarits D E, Wilferth W W, Blumenthal H P, Bates T R
J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Jan;19(1):39-45. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1979.tb01615.x.
The absorption of sulfapyridine after a single 2.0-Gm oral dose of sulfasalazine, the drug of choice in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, as commercial uncoated and enteric-coated and uncoated tablets was evaluated in four healthy male adults. The peak plasma concentration of sulfapyridine after the enteric-coated tablets occurred at 20 hours on the average (compared to 14 hours for the uncoated tablets) and was only 50% of that attained from the uncoated tablets (P less than 0.05). The low relative extent of systemic availability of sulfapyridine from the enteric-coated tablets (65.5 +/- 6.3 per cent, mean +/- S.E.) compared to uncoated tablets may be due to absorption rate-dependent presystemic metabolism, since the relative extent of sulfapyridine absorption was 92.7 +/- 6.2 per cent compared to uncoated tablets. These findings suggest that enteric-coated and uncoated tablets of sulfasalazine are not bioequivalent. It remains to be determined whether the clinical efficacy of sulfasalazine from enteric-coated tablets is affected.
在四名健康成年男性中,评估了单次口服2.0克柳氮磺胺吡啶(治疗炎性肠病的首选药物)后,市售未包衣片、肠溶包衣片和未包衣片的磺胺吡啶吸收情况。肠溶包衣片后磺胺吡啶的血浆峰值浓度平均出现在20小时(未包衣片为14小时),且仅为未包衣片的50%(P小于0.05)。与未包衣片相比,肠溶包衣片的磺胺吡啶全身可用性相对程度较低(65.5±6.3%,均值±标准误),这可能是由于吸收速率依赖性的首过代谢,因为与未包衣片相比,磺胺吡啶的吸收相对程度为92.7±6.2%。这些发现表明,柳氮磺胺吡啶的肠溶包衣片和未包衣片不是生物等效的。肠溶包衣片柳氮磺胺吡啶的临床疗效是否受到影响仍有待确定。